The Clinton Body Count [Archive]

Tom Joad

08-06-2016, 03:02 PM

Continues to go up and up and up.

Maybe Don was right.:eek:

http://politicalchat.org/showpost.php?p=327153&postcount=19

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/breaking-lead-attorney-dnc-fraud-case-found-dead-1-week-serving-dnc-papers/

ANOTHER MYSTERIOUS DEATH=> Activist and Sanders Supporter Who Served Papers to DNC on Fraud Case Found Dead

Boreas

08-06-2016, 03:26 PM

Continues to go up and up and up.

Maybe Don was right.:eek:

http://politicalchat.org/showpost.php?p=327153&postcount=19

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/breaking-lead-attorney-dnc-fraud-case-found-dead-1-week-serving-dnc-papers/

I'd say you've finally jumped the shark with this one but you did that a long time ago. This time I think the shark jumped you and then had its way with you.

Pio1980

08-06-2016, 03:38 PM

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

bobabode

08-06-2016, 03:47 PM

Consider the source, Joad.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Horowitz_Freedom_Center

finnbow

08-06-2016, 04:06 PM

Continues to go up and up and up.

Maybe Don was right.:eek:

http://politicalchat.org/showpost.php?p=327153&postcount=19

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/breaking-lead-attorney-dnc-fraud-case-found-dead-1-week-serving-dnc-papers/

I think you should leave Alabama. You're getting more stupid by the day.

Boreas

08-06-2016, 04:40 PM

I think you should leave Alabama. You're getting more stupid by the day.

As if Central Florida weren't bad enough.

d-ray657

08-06-2016, 04:57 PM

Consider the source, Joad.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Horowitz_Freedom_Center

Source checking and trolling seldom go hand in hand. I think we should consider the source of the thread before we spend too many keystrokes responding.

finnbow

08-06-2016, 04:58 PM

As if Central Florida weren't bad enough.

Indeed. From the frying pan into the fire.;)

Tom Joad

08-06-2016, 05:13 PM

I'd say you've finally jumped the shark with this one but you did that a long time ago. This time I think the shark jumped you and then had its way with you.

Consider the source, Joad.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Horowitz_Freedom_Center

I think you should leave Alabama. You're getting more stupid by the day.

As if Central Florida weren't bad enough.

Source checking and trolling seldom go hand in hand. I think we should consider the source of the thread before we spend too many keystrokes responding.

Indeed. From the frying pan into the fire.;)

I see.

It's the Trump people that have a monopoly on immature rhetoric. :rolleyes:

bobabode

08-06-2016, 05:20 PM

I see.

It's the Trump people that have a monopoly on immature rhetoric. :rolleyes:

Offering a source that shows you trust biased sources is immature rhetoric?

Your Clinton Derangement Syndrome is laughable, TJ.

d-ray657

08-06-2016, 05:31 PM

I see.

It's the Trump people that have a monopoly on immature rhetoric. :rolleyes:

You mistake reasoned analysis for immature rhetoric. Your record here and your past and current admissions of motive indicate trolling. And although at this point, I am acting contrary to my own advice, I am posting one last time to reiterate the appropriate response to your continued trolling -- which should be and will be no response at all.

Boreas

08-06-2016, 05:33 PM

I see.

It's the Trump people that have a monopoly on immature rhetoric. :rolleyes:

You invite this sort of response with every post you make. You have no one to blame but yourself.

whell

08-06-2016, 05:45 PM

Boreas

08-06-2016, 06:00 PM

The source doesn't matter in this case. The kid is still dead.

Troll #2 raises his ugly head.

bobabode

08-06-2016, 06:11 PM

The source doesn't matter in this case. The kid is still dead.

Seriously? Are you buying into this conspiracy theory too, Mike? :confused:

d-ray657

08-06-2016, 06:17 PM

There is more innuendo in that article than in a proctologist's office.

finnbow

08-06-2016, 06:50 PM

The source doesn't matter in this case. The kid is still dead.

As is every person who ever died.:confused:

Tom Joad

08-06-2016, 07:28 PM

Offering a source that shows you trust biased sources is immature rhetoric?

Your Clinton Derangement Syndrome is laughable, TJ.

And your Trump Derangement Syndrome? Don't look now, but there's an epidemic of that going around.

donquixote99

08-06-2016, 08:19 PM

Name one bad thing anyone has said about Trump that is contrary to fact, and can only be explained by 'derangement.'

Bet you can't name even one.

Tom Joad

08-06-2016, 08:25 PM

Name one bad thing anyone has said about Trump that is contrary to fact, and can only be explained by 'derangement.'

Bet you can't name even one.

One man's fact is another man's hyperbole.

bobabode

08-06-2016, 08:27 PM

And your Trump Derangement Syndrome? Don't look now, but there's an epidemic of that going around.

Sure Joad, suuuure. :rolleyes:

The press has had enough of Trump's lies and prevarications and like the sharks they are, they smell blood in the water, bro. The free ride is over for Cheeto Hitler and he's gonna end up squished like the fascist stinkbug he is. :D

finnbow

08-06-2016, 08:50 PM

One man's fact is another man's hyperbole.

Trump doesn't do facts.

BlueStreak

08-06-2016, 09:14 PM

Trump doesn't do facts.

But, hyperbole? Trump is the most hyperbolic guy you have EVER seen, bar none. No one does hyperbole like the Donald. His hyperbole is first class, without peer, folks. Trust me on that.

Pio1980

08-06-2016, 09:18 PM

But, hyperbole? Trump is the most hyperbolic guy you have EVER seen, bar none. No one does hyperbole like the Donald. His hyperbole is first class, without peer, folks. Trust me on that.

Plainly spoken, he's a bullshit artist.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

finnbow

08-06-2016, 09:36 PM

Plainly spoken, he's a bullshit artist.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Indeed, par excellence.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-unbearable-stench-of-trumps-bs/2016/08/04/aa5d2798-5a6e-11e6-831d-0324760ca856_story.html

donquixote99

08-06-2016, 10:51 PM

One man's fact is another man's hyperbole.

So name a 'hyperbole.' Name one. Can you name one?

One that is evidence of 'derangement' if one entertains it for a moment?

Pio1980

08-06-2016, 11:33 PM

It's still literally incredible that this babbling yam of a manchild bully is actually a presidential candidate.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

whell

08-07-2016, 12:20 AM

Seriously? Are you buying into this conspiracy theory too, Mike? :confused:

You and D-Ray were disputing the facts based on the source. I have no idea whether or not there's a "conspiracy" (though folks associated with the Clintons do seem to have a disproportionate rate of unfortunate things happening to them), but there's no disputing the reports that the kid is dead.

Tom Joad

08-07-2016, 12:38 AM

Name one bad thing anyone has said about Trump that is contrary to fact, and can only be explained by 'derangement.'

Bet you can't name even one.

Cheeto-Hitler?

Facist Stinkbug?

Trumperfuher?

Shit, it would take me all night to list all the immature Junior High School insults the Clinton people direct at Trump.

And yes, I am guilty of doing the same thing about Hillary.

So you see, you all are no better than I am, so shove your sanctimonious holier than thou attitude.

donquixote99

08-07-2016, 05:11 AM

Cheeto-Hitler?

Facist Stinkbug?

Trumperfuher?

Shit, it would take me all night to list all the immature Junior High School insults the Clinton people direct at Trump.

And yes, I am guilty of doing the same thing about Hillary.

So you see, you all are no better than I am, so shove your sanctimonious holier than thou attitude.

The difference, of course, is one doesn't have to be deranged to hold that Trump is an dangerous wanabee Hitler. The militant nationalism, the nativism, the bigotry, the brutality, the reliance on big lies--it's all right there. The assessment is based on facts, not on derangement.

It's actually easier to argue one has to be deranged to think otherwise.

Tom Joad

08-07-2016, 07:33 AM

The difference, of course, is one doesn't have to be deranged to hold that Trump is an dangerous wanabee Hitler. The militant nationalism, the nativism, the bigotry, the brutality, the reliance on big lies--it's all right there. The assessment is based on facts, not on derangement.

It's actually easier to argue one has to be deranged to think otherwise.

Gimmee a break Don.

It's two sides of the same coin and you know it.

donquixote99

08-07-2016, 08:22 AM

Gimmee a break Don.

It's two sides of the same coin and you know it.

No break for you.

You're in denial and you know it. The calls for national greatness, the blaming of outsiders, the scapegoating of Mexicans and Islamics, the advocacy of torture and terror, the petty cruelty, the pervasive lies--none of this is hidden. You just ignore it.

d-ray657

08-07-2016, 08:35 AM

You and D-Ray were disputing the facts based on the source. I have no idea whether or not there's a "conspiracy" (though folks associated with the Clintons do seem to have a disproportionate rate of unfortunate things happening to them), but there's no disputing the reports that the kid is dead.

The fact that a young man died is unquestionable. The suggestion that his death should be added to a "Clinton body count" is far from factual. You are capable of distinguishing between fact and innuendo, but you choose not to.

Oerets

08-07-2016, 09:13 AM

The fact that a young man died is unquestionable. The suggestion that his death should be added to a "Clinton body count" is far from factual. You are capable of distinguishing between fact and innuendo, but you choose not to.

It is just a way to try and reinforce the narrative they want to believe in, when all they have is innuendo and conspiracies.

Barney

whell

08-07-2016, 09:43 AM

The fact that a young man died is unquestionable. The suggestion that his death should be added to a "Clinton body count" is far from factual. You are capable of distinguishing between fact and innuendo, but you choose not to.

Really, that's your take-away from my post 28? I guess you could have read it more closely, but you chose not to. :rolleyes:

donquixote99

08-07-2016, 09:52 AM

I have no idea whether or not there's a "conspiracy"...

Ah, and you want full faith and credit for this disclaimer, after giving the thread the title "The Clinton Body Count?

(though folks associated with the Clintons do seem to have a disproportionate rate of unfortunate things happening to them...

Now we see the innuendo that's the basis of your attack. Come see the innuendo that's the basis of the attack!

Seems to me that d-ray had your number but good.

Tom Joad

08-07-2016, 10:37 AM

No break for you.

You're in denial and you know it. The calls for national greatness, the blaming of outsiders, the scapegoating of Mexicans and Islamics, the advocacy of torture and terror, the petty cruelty, the pervasive lies--none of this is hidden. You just ignore it.

This forum has become nothing but a pro-Clinton circle jerk.

It really is unseemly from an objective POV.

I'll hang around and try to provide at least some modicum of balance.

You can thank me later if you ever come to your senses.

Pio1980

08-07-2016, 10:41 AM

You can blame the sick joke Republican nominee for that.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

whell

08-07-2016, 10:47 AM

Ah, and you want full faith and credit for this disclaimer, after giving the thread the title "The Clinton Body Count?

I didn't "give the thread the title". I didn't start the thread.

Now we see the innuendo that's the basis of your attack. Come see the innuendo that's the basis of the attack!

Seems to me that d-ray had your number but good.

I can see how you'd draw that conclusion, since you can't even keep your facts straight about something as simple as who started this thread.

donquixote99

08-07-2016, 11:04 AM

Hmmm...seems i can't tell the difference between Joad and whell any more.

Boreas

08-07-2016, 11:16 AM

Hmmm...seems i can't tell the difference between Joad and whell any more.

An understandable mistake.

noonereal

08-07-2016, 11:27 AM

Hmmm...seems i can't tell the difference between Joad and whell any more.

Maybe we need a word for those that stereotype based on political belief?

d-ray657

08-07-2016, 11:29 AM

You and D-Ray were disputing the facts based on the source. I have no idea whether or not there's a "conspiracy" (though folks associated with the Clintons do seem to have a disproportionate rate of unfortunate things happening to them), but there's no disputing the reports that the kid is dead.

Really, that's your take-away from my post 28? I guess you could have read it more closely, but you chose not to. :rolleyes:

Upon a close reading I see that your parenthetical comment reinforces the rank speculation from the original source that the Clintons are responsible for the death. So yes, absolutely that is my take-away. I am immune to your Jedi mind tricks.

Tom Joad

08-07-2016, 04:28 PM

Hmmm...seems i can't tell the difference between Joad and whell any more.

I have come to expect cheap shots like that ever since I declined to get on the Clinton bandwagon.

Been taking a lot of hits here lately.

Think I need a new avatar to reflect that.;)

Tom Joad

08-10-2016, 06:52 PM

http://viralliberty.com/00066600006000-0-000/

The Clinton body count grows with 5 people found dead, all with solid links to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and the Clinton Foundation. Even more alarming is the media blackout on these mysterious deaths and the overwhelming evidence that those who died had insider knowledge that could have taken down Hillary and the whole Democrat Party.

Over the last month, bodies close to the Clintons and DNC have been dropping like flies. Five more have been added to the Clinton body count, adding to the speculations that Hillary won’t let anyone stand in her way, no matter what it takes. As the mainstream media seemingly avoids these stories, here’s what we know about those who met an untimely death after their ties to the Clintons and the DNC seemed to threaten Hillary’s presidential aspirations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvaILIaqHqo

finnbow

08-10-2016, 06:53 PM

Hmmm...seems i can't tell the difference between Joad and whell any more.

It's about time to tell them to get a room (at the Trump Taj Mahal, of course). Better hurry though. They're closing up shop in a few months.;)

bobabode

08-10-2016, 06:55 PM

Going full on rightwing troll, I see. Eh, Joad?

Pio1980

08-10-2016, 07:08 PM

Total conspiracy bullshit.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Tom Joad

08-10-2016, 07:16 PM

Going full on rightwing troll, I see. Eh, Joad?

Most people die of natural causes.

How do you explain so many of Clinton's critics dieing of gunshot wounds in so short a time? It would be interesting for someone to calculate the statistical odds of that happening coincidentally.

Tom Joad

08-10-2016, 07:18 PM

Total conspiracy bullshit.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

What's your problem?

I posted it in the conspiracy forum.

Tom Joad

08-10-2016, 07:20 PM

It's about time to tell them to get a room (at the Trump Taj Mahal, of course). Better hurry though. They're closing up shop in a few months.;)

And here comes the obligatory cheap shot from Finn.

I could set my watch by it.

Tom Joad

08-10-2016, 07:21 PM

Going full on rightwing troll, I see. Eh, Joad?

And right on Finn's heels comes the standard cheap shot from bob.

d-ray657

08-10-2016, 07:26 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqEX3Zx-UyM

bobabode

08-10-2016, 07:28 PM

And right on Finn's heels comes the standard cheap shot from bob.

That's the second time you've quoted my post. Losing your marbles, TJ?

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 10:53 AM

http://politicalsitenews.com/assange-seth-rich-went-missing-2-hours-death-know-inside-job/

Was Seth Rich assassinated? Many have speculated what happened to the DNC staffer that was murdered around the exact same time he worked to file a lawsuit against the DNC for rigging the election against Bernie Sanders and in favor of Hillary Clinton.

There are a ton of issues with the entire situation, but Julian Assange may have tipped his hand on this case. Wikileaks announced they’ve issued a $20,000 reward for information that leads to a conviction in the Seth Rich murder case. Seth Rich was shot and killed on July 10, 2016, by his home in Washington, D.C.

The top question many ask regarding the Seth Rich murder case is if he was assassinated for being the Wikileaks DNC leaker. Assange has never offered a reward of this magnitude, so it makes many believe that Seth played a pivotal role in helping Assange expose the DNC.

more (http://politicalsitenews.com/assange-seth-rich-went-missing-2-hours-death-know-inside-job/)

bobabode

08-27-2016, 10:58 AM

WikiLeaks may have started out as an organization dedicated to doing good but these days Assange is simply a puppet for Putin.

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 11:01 AM

WikiLeaks may have started out as an organization dedicated to doing good but these days Assange is simply a puppet for Putin.

He was a good guy until he started exposing the dirt about Hillary and the DNC.

Then he became Persona Non Grata.

I can relate to that.

By the way Bob.

I noticed it only took you fiv minutes to jump on this.

Whatever happened to:?

http://www.politicalchat.org/showpost.php?p=329054&postcount=59

Dondilion

08-27-2016, 12:00 PM

WikiLeaks may have started out as an organization dedicated to doing good but these days Assange is simply a puppet for Putin.

By exposing what is real.

Now, everybody is playing the Putin card... The Dems, the Repubs.

Noticed even in the Brexit referendum how heavily the Remain people tried the Putin card. The public is is very aware of this ploy.

bobabode

08-27-2016, 12:05 PM

By exposing what is real.

Now, everybody is playing the Putin card... The Dems, the Repubs.

Noticed even in the Brexit referendum how heavily the Remain people tried the Putin card. The public is is very aware of this ploy.

Maybe Pootine should keep his nose out of American politics.
Afterall, he's besties with Trump. ;)

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 12:10 PM

Maybe Pootine should keep his nose out of American politics.
Afterall, he's besties with Trump. ;)

Yeah, we should all vote for Hillary, so that we can bring back the good old days of the US/Russia relationship.

http://i843.photobucket.com/albums/zz359/Dog_of_the_Earth/dr-strangelove-still-580.jpg (http://s843.photobucket.com/user/Dog_of_the_Earth/media/dr-strangelove-still-580.jpg.html)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ynY5NvYsZY

Boreas

08-27-2016, 12:14 PM

Maybe Pootine should keep his nose out of American politics.
Afterall, he's besties with Trump. ;)

Maybe we should stay out of Russian politics.

bobabode

08-27-2016, 03:54 PM

Maybe we should stay out of Russian politics.

I'd be cool with that, as long as they stop annexing their neighbors.

Boreas

08-27-2016, 03:57 PM

I'd be cool with that, as long as they stop annexing their neighbors.

That was our fault, Bob.

bobabode

08-27-2016, 04:00 PM

That was our fault, Bob.

Oh, please. :rolleyes:

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 04:00 PM

I'd be cool with that, as long as they stop annexing their neighbors.

It might surprise you Bob, but there are actually some Americans that are sick and tired of us trying to play the role of the World's Police.

bobabode

08-27-2016, 04:05 PM

It might surprise you Bob, but there are actually some Americans that are sick and tired of us trying to play the role of the World's Police.

Maybe you should've thought of that before voting for St. Ronnie the Snitch back in the '80s, TJ.

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 04:09 PM

Maybe you should've thought of that before voting for St. Ronnie the Snitch back in the '80s, TJ.

So? Ya gotta go back 30 years to find a time when I was as dumb as you are today.

bobabode

08-27-2016, 04:12 PM

So? Ya gotta go back 30 years to find a time when I was as dumb as you are today.

There's that thin skin again. So much for your nonexistent pivot.

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 04:17 PM

There's that thin skin again. So much for your nonexistent pivot.

Tell it to your girl's buddy Wolfowitz.

bobabode

08-27-2016, 04:36 PM

Tell it to your girl's buddy Wolfowitz.

What a ridiculous premise. If you think Wolfowitz is going to have Clinton's ear because he's a #NeverTrumper, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn you might be interested in. :rolleyes:

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 05:11 PM

There's that thin skin again. So much for your nonexistent pivot.

Actually I think I've don quite well with my "pivot" as you call it, considering the steady non-stop barrage of Junior High School Bus Stop taunting that has been coming from you.

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 05:12 PM

What a ridiculous premise. If you think Wolfowitz is going to have Clinton's ear because he's a #NeverTrumper, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn you might be interested in. :rolleyes:

He doesn't need to "have her ear".

He is well aware of her Warmongering agenda for the Middle East and he likes it.

bobabode

08-27-2016, 05:14 PM

Actually I think I've don quite well with my "pivot" as you call it, considering the steady non-stop barrage of Junior High School Bus Stop taunting that has been coming from you.

There you go again, Tom.

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 05:45 PM

There you go again, Tom.

Trying to be like St. Ronnie?

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 05:57 PM

bobabode

08-27-2016, 06:44 PM

Hanging out at World Nut Daily again Joad?

d-ray657

08-27-2016, 07:39 PM

Do you guys notice how few posts there are by anyone else nowadays?

Tom Joad

08-27-2016, 07:49 PM

Do you guys notice how few posts there are by anyone else nowadays?

Good point.

I'll take the rest of the month off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRGLjzFHa40

Zeke

08-27-2016, 08:07 PM

Looking forward to it.

JJIII

08-28-2016, 07:46 AM

Do you guys notice how few posts there are by anyone else nowadays?

I have noticed that for quite some time. I have also noticed that frequently, when someone repeatedly expresses an opposing viewpoint, they are asked to leave, to go to another site that may fit their politics better.

Debate is not really welcome here now, by most.

The learning value has decreased dramatically, unless one wants to learn how to insult someone.

A shame, really.

donquixote99

08-28-2016, 08:41 AM

I have noticed that for quite some time. I have also noticed that frequently, when someone repeatedly expresses an opposing viewpoint, they are asked to leave, to go to another site that may fit their politics better.

Debate is not really welcome here now, by most.

The learning value has decreased dramatically, unless one wants to learn how to insult someone.

A shame, really.

JJ, you're basically a swell fellow, but, please, spare us. You're spinning a fairy tale. This very thread you are posting in draws on bullshit, lies, and innuendo, the very worst of internet attack propaganda. It was not placed here from any sincere desire to foster dialog; it's a perfect example of conservative alt reality with which dialog is impossible. See Leonard Pitt's excellent article about how this sort of thing destroys the very idea of 'common reality.' How conservative pundits helped break reality: Leonard Pitts Jr. (http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/08/how_conservative_pundits_helpe.html)

Mr. Joad has been told to get lost, I figure, not for merely 'repeatedly expressing an opposing viewpoint.' Asserting that is the reason, in fact, requires stupendous willful blindness. Indeed, the idea verges on a 'big lie.'

It basically takes two to debate. I know of no one on the right here willing and able to do it at this time.

icenine

08-28-2016, 08:51 AM

I'd forgotten about this "convenient" plane crash.

How many body bags is it going to take before people start taking the Clinton Crime Syndicate seriously? i

http://i843.photobucket.com/albums/zz359/Dog_of_the_Earth/14080055_126217901161893_8200435587193062513_n.jpg (http://s843.photobucket.com/user/Dog_of_the_Earth/media/14080055_126217901161893_8200435587193062513_n.jpg .html)

Actually he was not instrument rated, ran into a storm while crossing the ocean, and may have mistakenly believed he was climbing in altitude while he was actually heading down into the sea. He was not that experienced. Sometimes in bad visibility a pilot will mistakenly think that up is down or down is up or may even believe they are upside down. That is why they have to trust what the instrument panel in front of them is telling them and not what the body may be mistakenly telling their mind as to what their orientation is. In other words you may have to climb in altitude even though you feel like you are going down. Or you may have to keep your bearing even though you feel like you are upside down.

Imagine flying and not be able to see anything. If you could not see the ground below you or anything above you one could easily get disorientated.

JJIII

08-28-2016, 09:14 AM

JJ, you're basically a swell fellow, but, please, spare us. You're spinning a fairy tale. This very thread you are posting in draws on bullshit, lies, and innuendo, the very worst of internet attack propaganda. It was not placed here from any sincere desire to foster dialog; it's a perfect example of conservative alt reality with which dialog is impossible. See Leonard Pitt's excellent article about how this sort of thing destroys the very idea of 'common reality.' How conservative pundits helped break reality: Leonard Pitts Jr. (http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/08/how_conservative_pundits_helpe.html)

Mr. Joad has been told to get lost, I figure, not for merely 'repeatedly expressing an opposing viewpoint.' Asserting that is the reason, in fact, requires stupendous willful blindness. Indeed, the idea verges on a 'big lie.'

TJ is not the only one that has been asked to leave.

It basically takes two to debate. I know of no one on the right here willing and able to do it at this time.

Many others have left on their own accord. I maintain that a lot of them left because they tired of the sophomoric behavior some indulge in here.

As far as the ability to debate, it takes a willingness on both sides to honestly listen and consider the other viewpoint to have a debate. Sometimes that is sadly lacking here.

My comment was offered in agreement with Don's post. It matters not what thread it is in.

Pio1980

08-28-2016, 09:21 AM

icenine

08-28-2016, 09:31 AM

I've said elsewhere here that the thread is promulgation of conspiracy theory nonsense not worthy of debate. Not worthy of discussion or endless gainsaying or namecalling as well.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Well I was just pointing out what may have caused JFK Jr to crash.
Perhaps TJ thinks all-powerful Hillary called up the storm on purpose as JFK Jr was on his way back to Martha's Vineyard.

Pio1980

08-28-2016, 09:38 AM

Well I was just pointing out what may have caused JFK Jr to crash.
Perhaps TJ thinks all-powerful Hillary called up the storm on purpose as JFK Jr was on his way back to Martha's Vineyard.

Oh, I agree with this assessment.
What I was referring was the implication that some made that the Clintons did him in as part of a pattern of assassinations.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

donquixote99

08-28-2016, 10:02 AM

Many others have left on their own accord. I maintain that a lot of them left because they tired of the sophomoric behavior some indulge in here.

As far as the ability to debate, it takes a willingness on both sides to honestly listen and consider the other viewpoint to have a debate. Sometimes that is sadly lacking here.

My comment was offered in agreement with Don's post. It matters not what thread it is in.

There you go again with alt reality. Saying your post was 'in agreement' with Don's post draws him as a cloak around a post that is yours, not his. He said none of that stuff.

And it matters what thread you post in because you are asserting that the disdain thrown at Joad is undeserved. This very thread contradicts you.

Boreas

08-28-2016, 10:29 AM

I have noticed that for quite some time. I have also noticed that frequently, when someone repeatedly expresses an opposing viewpoint, they are asked to leave, to go to another site that may fit their politics better.

Debate is not really welcome here now, by most.

The learning value has decreased dramatically, unless one wants to learn how to insult someone.

A shame, really.

I disagree that people are asked to leave, certainly not for expressing a sincerely held opinion. I will agree that the suggestion that someone leave, to go to another site, is offered, it's intended as a tactic to point out that the person is posting garbage that would be better suited to another site.

For instance, if (as has happened periodically) a poster begins posting white supremacist opinion, someone might suggest to the poster that their opinions might be better received over at Storm Front. It's a way of saying that the poster's opinions are offensive and unwelcome (whether the are or not) without requiring a considered response.

As for TJ, it's pointless to suggest he go to another forum. He's been banned everywhere else.

JJIII

08-28-2016, 01:39 PM

There you go again with alt reality. Saying your post was 'in agreement' with Don's post draws him as a cloak around a post that is yours, not his. He said none of that stuff.

Talk about "alt reality". :rolleyes: Yours is yours and is "alt" to mine as it gets.

I never said that Don said that. I was agreeing with him that very few members post here anymore and offering my own opinion as to why they don't. If you will recall, I've mentioned this more than once.

And it matters what thread you post in because you are asserting that the disdain thrown at Joad is undeserved. This very thread contradicts you.

My comment was posted in this thread simply because this thread is where Don posted his comment.