Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   The Auto industry (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Chevy and Chrysler what can be done (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=23)

Grumpy 05-12-2009 04:23 PM

Chevy and Chrysler what can be done
 
Do we save or let chips fall where they may.

wajobu 05-12-2009 04:30 PM

I think that Chrysler was sunk when they went private and after Daimler gutted them, but GM is a very international and diversified company everywhere else 'cept here in the USA. GM makes some interesting products overseas, but (if I have it correct) the union agreements here do not permit those products to be sold here. I think that GM is foolish to spin-off Opel and Saturn, regardless of sales.

GM must survive in some form...we must have a home-grown vehicle mfr here...perhaps it's GM and Ford.

Independent 05-12-2009 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grumpy (Post 99)
Do we save or let chips fall where they may.

Let the chips fall!

You know, if the previous administration and the present one would have said NO to ALL the bailouts, this country would end up in a LOT better shape than it will eventually end up being in.......




Indy

wintermuted 05-12-2009 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Independent (Post 106)
You know, if the previous administration and the present one would have said NO to ALL the bailouts, this country would end up in a LOT better shape than it will eventually end up being in......

How so?

I'm no fan of the bailouts and I at least partially share your pessimism about their end effectiveness.

So let's play "what if?". What if our last two respective regimes would have played hardball with all the businesses who have been given a handout?

What would the end results have been in the long and short term, in your eyes?

Independent 05-12-2009 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wintermuted (Post 119)
How so?

I'm no fan of the bailouts and I at least partially share your pessimism about their end effectiveness.

So let's play "what if?". What if our last two respective regimes would have played hardball with all the businesses who have been given a handout?

What would the end results have been in the long and short term, in your eyes?

Just for starters, how about less taxes as a result of NOT bailing them out for us, for our children, and for our childen's children, etc. Where did all that bailout money come from, and how are we going to pay it back?




Indy

simi 05-12-2009 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wintermuted (Post 119)
How so?

I'm no fan of the bailouts and I at least partially share your pessimism about their end effectiveness.

So let's play "what if?". What if our last two respective regimes would have played hardball with all the businesses who have been given a handout?

What would the end results have been in the long and short term, in your eyes?

I think if we lost two auto makers at one time, the domino effect would have been huge... could you imagine what things would be like if they along with many massive financial companies were to have fallen around the same time?

A lot of support companies and industries that supply their needs would be hitting the streets and failing too. This place could be looking a lot worse had SOME of the bailouts not have happened... Others could have failed though. They just suqandered the money..

I'm still waiting for the next shoe personally. A country can't be so indebt, and the government hanging onto too much business interest without some sort of big change coming down the road.... I just hope it's not during my time... life hasn't been so bad since the last big changes, next one could be.

kretinus 05-12-2009 08:41 PM

I really don't think people who advocate the hands off approach really look at the big picture or have a unrealistic idea of how the economy works today.

On the other hand handing billions to banks with no strings was probably one of the more stupid ideas to come out of Washington when the people we handed it too have no ones interests but their own at heart.

If you think the tax bill for this will be worse than the ramifications of doing nothing, then I suggest you rethink things a bit deeper and consider all aspects of what would occur.

Most of the people I hear saying hands off also denied any problems to begin with.

Independent 05-12-2009 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simi (Post 127)
I think if we lost two auto makers at one time, the domino effect would have been huge... could you imagine what things would be like if they along with many massive financial companies were to have fallen around the same time?

A lot of support companies and industries that supply their needs would be hitting the streets and failing too. This place could be looking a lot worse had SOME of the bailouts not have happened... Others could have failed though. They just suqandered the money..

I'm still waiting for the next shoe personally. A country can't be so indebt, and the government hanging onto too much business interest without some sort of big change coming down the road.... I just hope it's not during my time... life hasn't been so bad since the last big changes, next one could be.

The U.S. auto industry is small potatoes compared to the U.S. housing industry and nobody bailed anybody out there. Do you know how many companies and privately held businesses have failed, or gone under, because of the collapse of the housing industry? IMHO, if one or the other "had" to fail, I would have definitely picked the auto industry. And don't get me wrong, I'm against any bailouts, my point here was to explain how insignificant the auto industry is compared to some of the "larger picture" industries such as housing.





Indy

Independent 05-12-2009 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kretinus (Post 130)
I really don't think people who advocate the hands off approach really look at the big picture or have a unrealistic idea of how the economy works today.

Most of the people I hear saying hands off also denied any problems to begin with.

Nope, I see the big picture and I also realized there were problems to begin with, although most, if not all of those problems were self-induced, and what better way to correct them than to let tham fail and start all over. Learn the lesson and move on. The main lesson everyone is learning now is, it's okay fail because someone will bail us out? Corporate welfare must end now before the U.S. government owns everything.....





Indy

kretinus 05-12-2009 11:41 PM

If you think this nation could survive just the economic impact of letting all these companies fail, then I suggest you really aren't looking at the big picture.

Then again if we let it crash, who ends up on top? The very people who crashed it in the first place, only then they would have total control.

Not my idea of what our forefathers envisioned.

Of course all this partsan BS isn't helping when both sides share equal blame and now stand in the way of getting back on track.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.