GM payback
It was in the KC news today that GM has repaid the $8.1 billion loan from the government - five years early. GM will be retooling the local plant to produce the next generation of Malibu. With that news, I would expect that the value of the stock the feds still hold in GM increased in value as well.
Regards, D-Ray |
They have a commercial about it - saw it this afternoon. Glad they paid it back. I'm guessing we'll get all the bail out money back with interest. Won't prevent people from yelling about bailouts over and over moving forward.
|
That's ashame. They should have all lost their jobs and collected from social programs until they had to turn to crime to survive. Can I get an amen sister sarah!
|
Quote:
I'm delighted that they've paid the loan back so early. This way all the Wing Nuts can't say that the gummint "owns GM". I take that back. It was never true. The loan was the "evidence" they pointed to but I'm sure they'll continue to say it anyway. By the way, the new Fiat-owned Chrysler showed a modest profit last quarter. Things are looking up despite Obama's best efforts to destroy the country. ;) John |
I always liked your posts john, this is just another example.;)
|
One correction, however, John. The Feds do still own GM, with 61% of the stock. Only the loan was paid back, not the investment. I'm not sure how the ownership share will be recovered by GM.
Regards, D-Ray |
Quote:
|
Quote:
On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised to see Wall Street try to Punish Obama for pushing financial reform. I'm sure some in the industry who could bring down the market if they wanted to. Regards, D-Ray |
Quote:
John |
Talked to my brother John yesterday. He is a retired GM engineer. It seems that despite the good news, he and all salaried retirees but top echelon execs (Of course), have lost their pensions and retiree health benefits. His pension now comes from PBGC and he pays a percentage (Didn't say what % that is.) of his health bennies, the rest is subsidized by---the IRS.
So, guess what? Despite the good news, GM did manage to dump it's salaried pensioners off on the taxpayer after all. Now, my Brother Ed, who is a retired Union guy still gets his pension and health benefits, but they are no longer paid by GM. The UAW has been forced, by the federal government, to pick up that tab. It is not known how long the UAW can bear this financial burden before they go broke. Or what will happen when that occurs. My guess is that all of the retired hourly guys will end up on the public dole as well. The net effect is that the company has shed all retirement obligations for everyone except executive level employees. And that the government has helped them pretty much crush the UAW. I tried to explain this to a wing-nut coworker today, and he said; "Bullshit. A guy on Limbaughs show said those fuckers are trying to get a 13% increase this year and we're paying for it." Where does it end? (The "it" being the absolute rubbish being spewed by people like Limbaugh, BTW.) Dave |
But, at least the money is being repaid. And perhaps GM, now relieved of those burdens will regain some of it's former greatness in the market place. Hopefully there will never be another bailout.
We shall see. Dave |
They paid back bailout money with bailout money. Whats to be happy about..
|
Quote:
|
Well there is one good thing, recent polls show that people are now thinking that American cars are better than Asian cars. Some of us knew that all along.
|
I thought on the last contract the automakers gave the UAW a big chunk of cash and the UAW took over the pension funding.
The new hires get a lot less than the oldtimers. Pete |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh no, they'll say it anyway. Reality never has any bearing on their rhetoric. Government run health insurance sound familiar? |
So they don't own 61%?
Pete |
Yes, they do. So what? If GM recovers and returns to profitability, (And I believe they will.) then earnings from stocks held goes into the government coffers. Bailout money returned + a share of any future profits.
Is there a problem with that? I don't think so. Oh, I know, "Shoulda let them fail. Should have just let everything fail.". And people want to vote for MORE of that twisted mentality in November? God, help us all. Dave |
Making money on stocks is good for this, but not ss?
I never thought GM should fail. Pete |
Quote:
But I believe the answer to your question is "Yes...but". Far as I know, the government became the majority holder in the company as part of the deal going into chapter 11. I don't think anything has changed in that regard. As I understand it, the "new GM" will at some point have to offer an IPO at which time the would hope to secure enough investment to offset the government investment. Wow, I'm not even sure I can say that right. That hasn't happened yet, but it doesn't diminish the fact that they are doing better than anyone expected. You can talk about taking TARP money to pay the bailout money, but fact is, they got it done years before anyone thought they would. It's money- they had the TARP and they had the loan. Now they just have the TARP. What line you account it on doesn't matter. If they didn't have they money they'd still be under both. Now they're only under one. I don't know if that made any sense at all, or if I understand this at all. But that's what I think I know about it. Feel free to correct me. |
Until and unless Wall Street is reformed playing the stock market is a great way for the average Joe to lose his shirt.
|
Eddie, I have NO idea. My gut says, Rob, you're right, but all I have is my 401k :(
It's good to see GM doing better. The new Malibu looks nice, reviews well, and hopefully will offset the Cobalts' bad rep. The Buick sport-ute looks mighty fine too. Pete |
Quote:
Regards, D-Ray |
Quote:
Dave |
Well Leland did leave Cadillac and started Lincoln - he had to keep moving upward :D
Springs tomorrow, if I'm not around Monday you know why :eek: Next time, I'm signing a note! Pete |
Quote:
Pete |
Now that the $CDN is at parity it is like getting a raise.
|
Quote:
John |
Quote:
John |
SS isn't backed by the Government?
Pete |
Quote:
Oops, just remembered you're going to tackle the Lincoln's suspension tomorrow. Good luck with that. Regards, D-Ray |
Quote:
John |
Quote:
And who backs the gooberment ? We do. I say we stop letting these pricks pay us back with our own money. |
Quote:
Tell me I ain't a smart money guy!!! The new GM commercial with the prez strutting through the GM plant like a stud duck is enough to make me puke. It's a shell game. Chas |
The way the talking heads described it, GM used a Visa to pay off the Mastercard.
|
Look at it this way, they had a loan just in case, be glad they did not need it and so they gave it back. better our own automobile company than some effing asian thieves.
|
From what I've heard, not only are they 'paying back' the government with govenment money, they're doing it to look better for another bigger cheaper government loan.
If true this would be the biggest lie we've swallowed since ss was 'fixed'. I await further information. Pete |
|
Funny, it is a bad thing for the gummint to help GM, but it is a good thing for all those states to give land and tax breaks to foreign auto makers.:confused:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.