Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak
It's because "Social Contract" sounds and is, in some measure, collectivist. It rubs their "every man for himself" mentality the wrong way. The "Law of the Jungle" appeals to their base primal instincts and is therefore more compatible with the modern conservative mentality. Baboons don't pool their resources to care for other Baboons that can't keep up with the troupe, they bite and stomp them to death to prevent them from holding the others back. See what I'm sayin'? 
Dave |
Excellent point. Take this to the extreme, where we have no "social contact".
Everyman for himself. The ultimate winner has everything, and no one else even exhists. What is the point to being super wealthy or well tto do if there are no other humans to (pick your thoughts - rule over, share with, make jealous, take more from, give to, etc).
Monopoly is a fun game, but in real life it would suck. I win and have everything - no one else has anything.
So being human means being social. Without a person might as well crawl under a rock and live entirely uninterruped for the remainder of their life.
BTW - excellent link and great thread too.