|
FinBow:
The fact that Wolfowitz has a weak moment and admits the lying rhetoric was "bureaucratic convienience" or whatever -- doesn't weaken my theory. I'm allowing that none of WMD threat ever really existed. SOMETHING ELSE was the real motivation for both Admins.
If you want to believe that the US went to war to test some dumbass neo-con theory about rainbows and unicorns in the Middle East, have at it. But first tell me why
a) The majority of DEM leadership offered virtually no resistance.
b) Clinton didn't choose to follow the European leaders insistence that the sanctions were over because of lack of justification from the Weapons Inspection teams. In other words, my #2 option above.
c) What the neo-con plan was when they rolled thru that country and can't find a TRACE of the stuff they claimed was there? They knew they'd have to bear that humility and degrace.. What made it worth it?
My theory answers all three of those...
|