View Single Post
  #28  
Old 07-06-2010, 08:45 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
What a clown! At one point in this talk he said that Noah probably didn't need to take both a horse a zebra on the ark because "probably the horse and the zebra had a common ancestor. I wouldn't argue about that but it was... it looked like a horse."

Okay, Einstein. So if Noah didn't take zebras and horses on the ark but took their "common ancestor" what happened to the common ancestor? Did it evolve into horses and zebras? Oh, wait! There's no such thing as evolution! I'm so confused!

John
Noah was way smart to, like Sarah and him. After all he lived to 900 years old.
Reply With Quote