Quote:
Originally Posted by flacaltenn
I've always wondered whether anti-2nd-amendment types would be consistent in interpretation if elements of the 1st amendment had been phrased with a preceeding justification like...
"A well-informed citizenry being neccessary to make reasoned choices at the ballot box, the right of the people to read books of choice shall not be infringed"
Obviously, you don't vote --- You don't need to be carrying that high-caliber Kindle. Put down that e-reader son, and slowly step away...
|
The problem with that analogy is that Kindles are not lethal weapons.
It's interesting that you use the terms "anti 2nd Amendment." It might be more accurate to describe such folks a narrow interpreters of the 2nd Amendment.
Are you suggesting that the right to bear arms is more important to a democracy than a broadly interpreted protection of free speech?
Regards,
D-Ray