Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
No question the EO was not well - implemented or well communicated. But, of course, that doesn't have a thing to do with the title of this thread, complete with the Nixonian references that have been buzzing around the left wing echo chamber...which it appears a place where you're right at home.  |
The nixonian reference was a direct CNN copy. Probably not the most objective agreed.
The AG may not have acted in the most professional manner, but I completely disagree with your comments that her job is to follow the orders of the pres. If this was the case, there would be no need to have an AG. The attorney general's first responsibility is to make sure the laws be proposed and enforced are legal - far above any loyalty or responsibility to any other member of the government. That is the purpose of the position.