[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

Do you understand the usage of the words "proof" and "evidence"? They're used interchangeably by politicians who should know better, but let's do better here.

So far, there's no "proof" that Biden was corrupt. There's quite a bit of evidence that some odd things were going on. But evidence is not proof.

Was there an appearance of impropriety that, at the same time Hunter was on the board of Burisma, his dad was flying to Ukraine ostensibly to meet with the Ukrainian government about how the United States could help provide technical expertise for expanding domestic production of natural gas? Sure there was, although I'm not sure that many folks here would agree with that.

Similarly, with Thomas, there's no proof that he was involved with bribery unless Finn can provide some direct evidence of it. Was Thomas' behavior ethically lacking? Yes, I think so.

There, does that clarify? Or do you want to throw more shit on the wall to see if it sticks?

Seems like too much time on your hands.