Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
You actually believe that Mueller and the SDNY aren't investigating actual crimes (or that the crimes Manafort is currently charged with aren't crimes)?  I suppose if that helps you sleep at night, continue believing the unbelievable. Once Mueller's and SDNY's hammers come down on the extended Trump crime family, it will be interesting to hear the spin you come up with to help you rationalize your continued support of such an obvious con man. |
Sure I do, and there's ample proof of that. For example, Comey told Congress during his testimony that no one at the FBI thought that Flynn had lied to them. And yet, Flynn plead guilty to lying to the FBI. Now, you can speculate all you want about why Flynn agreed to plea, but there's ZERO evidence that Flynn's plea has anything to do with Trump's campaign or Russian "collusion".
You can also speculate all you want about the other pleas, none of which indicate the Flynn has any evidence of "Russian collusion". The indictments also have nothing to do with "Russian collusion".
So, if Mueller's charter is to investigate "Russian collusion", where's evidence of the crime? There is none, and Mueller can apparently look for one all he wants, and destroy anyone he wants in the process. Unless, of course, some adults step in and reign him in.