View Single Post
  #41  
Old 07-30-2011, 09:46 PM
flacaltenn's Avatar
flacaltenn flacaltenn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCricket View Post
hey, we agree on something.

Yeah, a better graph would be nice, but get past that and the info is interesting.

A couple fo questions that came to my mind:
Okay, bush increase the debt by 7 Trillion, obama by 1.4 trillion(IIRC), the rest is due to poor economy downgrade. The graph appears to show this in a timeline as well. So, the question, did some of Bush's debt come from a poor economy as well? The graph does not depict this. (I hate bush so I don't care ).

ANother thing, these debts are depicted as Bushs's responsibility/fault. Were they? Or, did he inherit them from previous administations? I am sure the Afgahnastan/Irag war fall under him, but what about the rest.

I am not trying to defend Bush, but I am trying to point out the fallacy of blaming a president for out financial woes. These bills had to be approved by our elected clowns.
The graph is completely cooked -- you cute little bug you.. All one needs to do is notice that the Bush is charged with "domestic and defense" spending and NONE appears for the Obama admin.. And that's just the BEGINNING of this fraud..

It's selective crappola.. Completely fabricated.. A new LOW for political spinning from "the people's house"..

We should all feel ashamed for propaganda like that.. I think I'll keep that as a reminder to other folks when election time comes closer..

Last edited by flacaltenn; 07-30-2011 at 09:49 PM.
Reply With Quote