Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajoo
Now I am going to step into it, who is the they?
The way it works in our country of law and order (or used to) is, first present evidence like Dominion did against their lawsuit with Fox. Then sue or prosecute. The Dotard and his consigliere Barr had two years to do this if they had any sort of credible evidence, but all we got was tweets and rants.
In reality what happened? Trump got caught running an extorsion campaign with our tax money and got caught. Senate declined to judge him, not same as being exonerated, since the House had presented copious amounts of evidence. Otherwise there will not be any articles for impeachment.
As part of this Trump's deflection campaign, conspiracies and innuendos arose, first in order to throw up a smoke screen and then later an attempt to damage Joe Biden's candidacy (Benghazi).
So first try and offer credible proof.
And if I am not mistaken Hunter Biden is either contemplating or actually is bringing legal action on his 'laptop' mystery.
|
I'm thinking Merrick Garland , or however you spell his name.
The proof is overwhelming.
Really, once you decide right and wrong by who you want to be President ?
Have you ever considered that Hunter Biden is absolutely useless to anybody without his father's name you will understand grifting.