Should Al Franken Resign?

[whell]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

Who is profiting from this news story? What party does this woman person belong to? And what is the motivation now and not before. IMO, an extrovert and a look at me woman does not pass the litmus test that she was afraid to speak against Franken then.

One + One + One makes Three. There is your proof.

What you are failing to understand is that Franken is inviting an investigation by the Senate; and don't tell me the GOP is not licking their chops and has offered to cooperate and can be appropriately censured. If he is forced to resign, so be it. No Democrat will (or should) come out in support of his actions.

So WTF? So where is the GOP on Moore eh? Where was the GOP on Trump?
Trump is the leader because the party is made up of morons.

So that's your standard litmus test of the veracity of a woman's claim of abuse: Who profits from it? What party does she belong to?

[bobabode]

Evidently Whellie is too stupid to realize he's boxed himself in with this moronic thread. Too effin' funny.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

So that's your standard litmus test of the veracity of a woman's claim of abuse: Who profits from it? What party does she belong to?

Not my litmus test but a test by the voting public.

If Franken is found guilty by the Senate Ethics Committee, I expect him to resign. And he has agreed to abide by their decision.

Mean while Trump, rapist extraordinaire (you do get that well more 50% of women in the US absolutely detest Trump right?) and the pedophile Moore are lying and attacking the very women they are alleged to have molested.

So where is your bar set at?

[barbara]

Originally Posted by whell

Yeah, I know that. I suspect Juanita Broaddrick knows that as well.

She recanted her story.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by barbara

She recanted her story.

Then later she un-recanted it. I have no idea what to believe in this case, but I'm glad I won't be asked to vote for Bill again.

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Then later she un-recanted it. I have no idea what to believe in this case, but I'm glad I won't be asked to vote for Bill again.

Bill Clinton is not credible.

[Ike Bana]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Then later she un-recanted it. I have no idea what to believe in this case, but I'm glad I won't be asked to vote for Bill again.

I'd vote for Bill again in a nano-second. Why don't we hate JFK like we hate Bill? Jack makes Bill look like a rank amateur philanderer. Jack makes any other occupant in the history of the Oval Office who couldn't figure out a way to keep his pecker in his pants look like a rank amateur.

But we sure hate Bill's guts.

[Chicks]

Folks, you can’t let Whell get to you. That’s his goal.

Remember, he’s a Trump supporter. Just how moronic does one have to be, at this point, to still support Trump?

Whell’s opinions are not worth the dirt on the soles of your shoes. Just think how lost poor Whelly will be when his idiot hero is behind bars. He’s a joke!

[Oerets]

This only proves the Right whole hearty believe, the end justifies the means. Willing to look the other way on totally disgusting people. When it is going to get them tax, regulation cuts, judges they want and so on.


Barney

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by Oerets

This only proves the Right whole hearty believe, the end justifies the means. Willing to look the other way on totally disgusting people. When it is going to get them tax, regulation cuts, judges they want and so on.


Barney

Left wingers (lefty's as whell calls them) being the perverts, right wingers as the righteous. Realistically I see the lefty's as inept and righty's as evil. This is how and why we got Trump. Evil always wins in the end unlike in the movies.