Quote:
Originally Posted by djv8ga
Look, this a stupid question, but I'm no expert in nuclear plants.
I heard an "expert" on the radio claim that the old rods were more radioactive than the new rods.
Is this true? If it is, why are they?
|
That may be true when they first pop them out of the reactor. There are lots of isotopes produced in the reactor, both fission products (created when atoms are split) and isotopes created when atoms absorb extra neutrons. But a characteristic of radioactive elements is they decay as they emit particles, and the faster they emit particles, the faster they decay. The most radioactive isotopes thus have half-lives measured in weeks (or less).
Here's a graph of overall radioactive decay over time for three type of nuclear fuel, from
Wikipedia.
A thing to note is that plot has a logarithmic scale on both axis. That means that on a linear scale, those lines would basically look like this:
Very fast decrease at first, then a long tail.