Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
All you've done here is reveal your ignorance of California and its geology. There are active faults and fault systems all over the western third of the state. They underlie the cities of Los Angeles, San Jose, San Francisco, Oakland, Santa Rosa and quite a few others. California has a population of over 35 million. Probably 20 million people live in the earthquake prone part of the state so what you have is a fait accompli. Should all those people be required to shift for themselves when the next quake hits? Should the area be forcibly abandoned?
John
|
No.. Not FORCIBLY abandoned.. It should be VOLUNTARILY abandoned like ole flaCALtenn did in 2005.. I fled the state even tho I was perfectly cloned to Silicon Valley because I was sitting on (what Californians considered) a $Mill property just a 1/2 mile from the San Andreas without earthquake insurance. (Because the state screwed that up royally and made it impossible to justify)
(Trust me --- the $Mill home was nothing to brag about)
AND my daughter was entering high schools that were dominated by gang bangers and functionally illiterate air heads. (those are the BRIGHT scholars)
So the move to Tenn made me feel like a bank robber and I fully expected to be apprehended at Bakersfield with the loot I carried out of the state to buy my palatial Tenn pastural bliss.
California is a failed experiment in direct democracy. The residents have no one to blame except themselves since they voted for every RAIL bond, every SCHOOL bond, every politically motivated Stem Cell Research boondongle. I got tired of authoring all those futile Libertarian objections to these ballot measures that continued to pass. (You Cali folks have read my work in those 100 pages "Voters Handbooks" that come out each election!!)
No way they will pass off that burden on me now...