|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
08-10-2016, 05:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,223
|
|
Hashtag Rationalia
Neil deGrasse Tyson has swizzled up a fun discussion on Twitter. He proposed a virtual country, Rationalia, that has a one line constitution. The fantasy constitution reads, "All policy shall be based on the weight of evidence."
http://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/neil...-of-government
What can go wrong with basing all policy on the weight of evidence?
In my limited experience I foresee one glaring problem with such an oversimplified system. To wit, if policy is based on evidence then the undesirable backlash is a black market on evidence.
Case in point.
One of my earliest debates on the internet was on the subject of land use. I live near Detroit and despise how we waste land. My sparring partner found data that suggested people are happier in Detroit than they are in an area with more structured land use such as Portland, OR. He won our debate IMO.
We had a perfectly rational debate and yet Detroit won over Portland as a good example of land use in that sample. Why?
This stuff is fun to think about.
__________________
People like stories.
|
08-10-2016, 05:57 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,070
|
|
How is "happiness" rated?
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
|
08-10-2016, 06:02 PM
|
|
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,174
|
|
You ran smack into the limits of rationality. Rationality works with facts and logic, measurements and observations. Rationality has NOTHING TO SAY about what sort of land use makes people happier. That is decided by people, based on their emotional reactions, which are based on SUBCONSCIOUS logic, that cannot be examined or corrected.
Any theory about what sort of land use is desirable is unreal, because it cannot be based on what makes people happy. What makes people happy cannot be accessed by conscious reason.
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
|
08-10-2016, 06:33 PM
|
|
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980
How is "happiness" rated?
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
|
Ask Aristotle.
"Hence, if everyone has a natural right to the pursuit of happiness, and if that means that happiness must be attainable by all, then we know at once, do we not, that power over other men cannot be a part of human happiness -- for if it were, happiness would not be attainable by all. The pursuit of happiness must be co-operative, not competitive."
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|
08-10-2016, 06:53 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,223
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980
How is "happiness" rated?
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
|
Interesting question.
Bigger is better. That seems to be the psychology of data.
Designers struggle with that psychology as they design user interfaces such as gauges in cars, graphs for their bosses, etc. As they design they know there are bigger questions that want to be answered.
When I attended law school I learned how much weight there is in wording of a jury question. I was taught that the best jury question is the one that gets the most votes. But what is actually best in the long run may well be independent of such an instant question. That is the narrow space that Neil deGrasse Tyson is dabbling in. I respect him for his courage.
__________________
People like stories.
|
08-11-2016, 12:18 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,737
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657
Ask Aristotle.
"Hence, if everyone has a natural right to the pursuit of happiness, and if that means that happiness must be attainable by all, then we know at once, do we not, that power over other men cannot be a part of human happiness -- for if it were, happiness would not be attainable by all. The pursuit of happiness must be co-operative, not competitive."
|
The definition of pursuit is "an effort to secure or obtain, a quest".
Nothing in the word implies your desire must actually be attainable. Therefore I think Aristotle jumps the shark with his second "if".
The dogs pursue the mechanical rabbit around the track, but it is never obtained.
__________________
"You can't always get what you want" -Rolling Stones
Last edited by Wasillaguy; 08-11-2016 at 12:22 AM.
|
08-11-2016, 05:31 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,164
|
|
I was in Orlando, Florida when the rabbit track broke, and every single greyhound savaged the rabbit. The crowd was deliriously estactic, roaring with approval as each dog waited, and then had its way with the rabbit.
Happiness can only be attained if you let yourself be happy. Once you figure that part out, that you alone make yourself happy, then you realize you can be happy almost every day, and many times a day.
|
08-11-2016, 07:04 AM
|
|
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,174
|
|
Some of our inate happiness makers conflict with others. We can do without the blood-sports ones, IMHO.
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
|
08-12-2016, 03:44 PM
|
|
Resident octogenarian
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657
Ask Aristotle.
"Hence, if everyone has a natural right to the pursuit of happiness, and if that means that happiness must be attainable by all, then we know at once, do we not, that power over other men cannot be a part of human happiness -- for if it were, happiness would not be attainable by all. The pursuit of happiness must be co-operative, not competitive."
|
Having had, and returned, the unconditional love of a good, and very accomplished woman I found that it as impossible not to be happy.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Last edited by merrylander; 08-13-2016 at 09:36 AM.
|
08-12-2016, 06:40 PM
|
|
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980
How is "happiness" rated?
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
|
Differently by different people.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.
|