Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Economy
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-14-2018, 11:57 AM
ZeroJunk ZeroJunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
Like I did in 2009 when nearly every dumbass Republican in my life was jerking their money out because the "Kenyan Soshialist" was going to "utterly destroy America". As usual, they were panicked, irrational and wrong.
I actually bought $30,000 more stock in 2009.

Should have kept it. But, that was when I decided I was going to be a trader. So, when I made 5% I would take it.

If I had just bought most anything and sat on it I would have been better off.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2018, 12:15 PM
Chicks Chicks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 13,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroJunk View Post
I actually bought $30,000 more stock in 2009.

Should have kept it. But, that was when I decided I was going to be a trader. So, when I made 5% I would take it.

If I had just bought most anything and sat on it I would have been better off.
So you’re not really an investor at all, you’re a speculator. Sigh. Speculators rarely win, it’s basically betting, not investing. Unless, of course, they have insider help.
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2018, 03:38 PM
ZeroJunk ZeroJunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicks View Post
So you’re not really an investor at all, you’re a speculator. Sigh. Speculators rarely win, it’s basically betting, not investing. Unless, of course, they have insider help.
That's bullshit. There are traders that make good money at it and all they rely on are the charts, candlestick patterns, or whatever works for them.

And, shorting is a necessary aspect of the market. Otherwise how would you ever establish the value of a stock if somebody didn't say no, I think it is overvalued.

Subscribing to a real time charting service is expensive and what is really somewhat entertaining in the beginning becomes a job very quickly.

From your post in your case it would be betting and no doubt something you should avoid.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-15-2018, 08:48 AM
Chicks Chicks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 13,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroJunk View Post
That's bullshit. There are traders that make good money at it and all they rely on are the charts, candlestick patterns, or whatever works for them.
And over time, they will all lose compared to simple index funds. Warren Buffett just won a $1M bet against a pricey hedge fund over this very issue. But, guys who vote for con artists like Trump clearly aren’t very bright.
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-15-2018, 11:18 AM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicks View Post
So you’re not really an investor at all, you’re a speculator. Sigh. Speculators rarely win, it’s basically betting, not investing. Unless, of course, they have insider help.
Even with an indexed S&P 500 fund you're speculating too.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-15-2018, 11:30 AM
Chicks Chicks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 13,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer View Post
Even with an indexed S&P 500 fund you're speculating too.
Which is why you use asset allocation to balance risk and reward, moving toward lower risk as you grow older. Lots of great index funds from Vanguard that make it easy to do this, and, over time, will always outperform the speculators.
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-15-2018, 06:34 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicks View Post
Which is why you use asset allocation to balance risk and reward, moving toward lower risk as you grow older. Lots of great index funds from Vanguard that make it easy to do this, and, over time, will always outperform the speculators.
Pretty stiff loads in some of those lifestyle mutual funds, though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-17-2018, 12:52 PM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicks View Post
Which is why you use asset allocation to balance risk and reward, moving toward lower risk as you grow older. Lots of great index funds from Vanguard that make it easy to do this, and, over time, will always outperform the speculators.
You sound like a Vanguard financial advisor/consultant.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-17-2018, 01:06 PM
Chicks Chicks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 13,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer View Post
You sound like a Vanguard financial advisor/consultant.
Well, unlike most investment firms, as an investor in their funds, you are an owner of the company, so in a way you’re correct. Wish I could move my 401K there from Fidelity, as well; my Vanguard returns have substantially outperformed the 401K, with its higher fees and limited choices.
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-17-2018, 06:56 PM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicks View Post
Well, unlike most investment firms, as an investor in their funds, you are an owner of the company, so in a way you’re correct. Wish I could move my 401K there from Fidelity, as well; my Vanguard returns have substantially outperformed the 401K, with its higher fees and limited choices.
No thanks, I'll stick with my current investment mix/strategy.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.