Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-20-2014, 02:21 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
Most investment professionals my ass.

And in my opinion....
And that's all it is. Your opinion.

Investment guidance is never a "one-size-fits-all" proposition, and I never indicated that it was. However, for most folks who have access to a 401(k) plan, it will make sense for them to leverage that plan as part of their investment strategy. 'Nuf said.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-20-2014, 02:53 PM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
And that's all it is. Your opinion.
I think you mean "our" opinions, since that's what I suggested in my prior post...you have yours, I have mine. And even more so since the real fact is:

"Nothing exists except atoms and empty space, everything else is opinion." - Democritus

Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Investment guidance is never a "one-size-fits-all" proposition, and I never indicated that it was. However, for most folks who have access to a 401(k) plan, it will make sense for them to leverage that plan as part of their investment strategy. 'Nuf said.
Nuf said, because you said nuf said? Take a hike.

I never indicated it was a "one-size-fits-all" proposition.

If a 401K makes sense for somebody, that's fine. What makes sense to me is not forking over money to bloodsucking vampire banksters because I'm too lazy to do a couple of hours of work a year (that I oughta be doing even if I have a 401K anyway, to make sure I'm not being ripped off). You're the one who started acting like a fucking expert when I suggested that 401K's are not always what they're cracked up to be.

And it's so interesting that you just can't acknowledge that your $17,500 pre-tax max was wrong. Reckon the percentage of 401K investors who actually have enough income to get anywhere near the pre-tax 401K max? Reckon you can clue me in?

Last edited by Ike Bana; 05-20-2014 at 02:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-20-2014, 04:27 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
Nuf said, because you said nuf said? Take a hike.
Thanks. I enjoy hiking. And biking, and jogging, etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
And it's so interesting that you just can't acknowledge that your $17,500 pre-tax max was wrong. Reckon the percentage of 401K investors who actually have enough income to get anywhere near the pre-tax 401K max? Reckon you can clue me in?
If its wrong, then please take it up with the IRS.

http://www.irs.gov/Retirement-Plans/...ibution-Limits

Deferral limits for 401(k) plans

The limit on employee elective deferrals (for traditional and safe harbor plans) is:

$17,500 (in 2013 and 2014)

The $17,500 amount may be increased in future years for cost-of-living adjustments


Of course, that doesn't include CUP contributions for those that might be eligible.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.