Trumps is in! - Page 207

noonereal · #1 05-25-2016, 08:12 AM

This campaign is great! I am listening to Elizabeth Warren rip into Trump on MSNBC and it's as ridiculous as the cra% the Donald says. I laughed and laughed like I do at Donald.

I'd love this fireball to run against Donald, lots of fun it would be!

donquixote99 · #2 05-25-2016, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noonereal

This campaign is great! I am listening to Elizabeth Warren rip into Trump on MSNBC and it's as ridiculous as the cra% the Donald says. I laughed and laughed like I do at Donald.

I'd love this fireball to run against Donald, lots of fun it would be!

Here's a link to a 10-minute portion of Warren's speech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1Mrfu4yE-w

Care to give an example, with time ref, of ANYTHING that is as 'ridiculous' as what Donald says? I call FALSE EQUIVALENCY.

Warren does a fine job roasting the Donald, but I like the redirect to the Mission that begins at 8:38.

noonereal · #3 05-25-2016, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Here's a link to a 10-minute portion of Warren's speech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1Mrfu4yE-w

Care to give an example, with time ref, of ANYTHING that is as 'ridiculous' as what Donald says? I call FALSE EQUIVALENCY.

Warren does a fine job roasting the Donald, but I like the redirect to the Mission that begins at 8:38.

If you can't see the absurdity you can't see the absurdity.

It made me laugh.

donquixote99 · #4 05-25-2016, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noonereal

If you can't see the absurdity you can't see the absurdity.

It made me laugh.

Sigh. Another discussion prompt refused.

C'mon, point out one laughable, absurd thing. Just one.

noonereal · #5 05-26-2016, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Sigh. Another discussion prompt refused.

C'mon, point out one laughable, absurd thing. Just one.

Honest Q, it was absurd. I saw it again last night and roared even louder with laughter.

She totally misrepresent what he said so egregiously that I just laughed.

Watch his statement on this then watch her haterade. (I made a new word

)

I will not explain the obvious for you are barbie to deny the reality which is all that would occur.

sorry

Tom Joad · #6 05-26-2016, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Here's a link to a 10-minute portion of Warren's speech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1Mrfu4yE-w

Care to give an example, with time ref, of ANYTHING that is as 'ridiculous' as what Donald says? I call FALSE EQUIVALENCY.

Warren does a fine job roasting the Donald, but I like the redirect to the Mission that begins at 8:38.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/25/politi...-donald-trump/

Quote:

Pocahontas

MrPots · #7 05-25-2016, 08:17 AM

What I'm seeing is the voting public totally losing their heads over shit that ain't going to happen, further dividing us while behind the curtain the ruling party drags this country down the toilet to the benefit of the 1%.

Divide and conquer...such a simple concept and so effective.

I hate seeing ya'll at each others throats over a tactic.

noonereal · #8 05-25-2016, 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrPots

What I'm seeing is the voting public totally losing their heads over shit that ain't going to happen, further dividing us while behind the curtain the ruling party drags this country down the toilet to the benefit of the 1%.

Divide and conquer...such a simple concept and so effective.

I hate seeing ya'll at each others throats over a this tactic.

a lot of truth in this

Rajoo · #9 05-25-2016, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrPots

What I'm seeing is the voting public totally losing their heads over shit that ain't going to happen, further dividing us while behind the curtain the ruling party drags this country down the toilet to the benefit of the 1%.

Divide and conquer...such a simple concept and so effective.

I hate seeing ya'll at each others throats over a tactic.

While I agree with you on the premise of your post, Hills and Drumpf is what we got and we have to work with what we got. I don't know why better qualified candidates do not run unless the two parties who completely control the nominating process have made it impossible. So whether we like it or not the dialog is Hillary vs. Trump. I think the DNC has been on a mission coronating Hillary and that reading Hillary's platform will put someone to sleep.

noonereal · #10 05-25-2016, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rajoo

While I agree with you on the premise of your post, Hills and Drumpf is what we got and we have to work with what we got. I don't know why better qualified candidates do not run unless the two parties who completely control the nominating process have made it impossible. So whether we like it or not the dialog is Hillary vs. Trump. I think the DNC has been on a mission coronating Hillary and that reading Hillary's platform will put someone to sleep.

Better qualified than Hill? Few are.

Better qualified than Trump? Many are and ran. 17 others were more qualified that ran. They were rejected.