|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
05-20-2011, 11:19 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,145
|
|
Remember FinBow: The MIRV and decoy problem is a legal argument. No "weapons" in space. The original concept for ICBM defense was to intercept in the "post-boost" phase when velocities are relatively VERY low and potentially even before the MIRV deployed. If you were allowed to use a real weapon at that point --- anything that went boom or sizzle or pop --- the system effficacy goes up tremendously.
I think it's silly to say that below the stratospere, you can have unlimited weapons, but you can't use weapons to defend yourself against awful weapons that somebody is raining down on you FROM space.
Best not to get into further details -- but the ORIGINAL concept was sound. And I'm all for shielding America from an active attack.
|
05-20-2011, 11:20 AM
|
|
Area Man
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal
they are a necessity that have eroded the quality of life IMHO
|
Necessity? When did they become a necessity? Have you forgotten that darn few of us even had one just 15 tears ago? They are a convenience is what they are.
I don't hate them, they are useful, but they can be annoying when you don't want to be bothered. I remember a girlfriend, Sabrina, whose mother had the uncanny ability to know exactly when to call................ . Eventually I found ways to get into her bag and shut the damn thing off, when I could.
Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
|
05-20-2011, 12:27 PM
|
|
AKA Sister Mary JJ
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Upper East Tennessee
Posts: 5,897
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak
just 15 tears ago?
|
Considering the subject, that's funny right there!
__________________
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please." (Mark Twain)
|
05-20-2011, 12:48 PM
|
|
Area Man
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
|
|
Ha, ha...............(How did I miss that?)
Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
|
05-22-2011, 03:19 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 3,261
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak
Necessity? When did they become a necessity? Have you forgotten that darn few of us even had one just 15 tears ago? They are a convenience is what they are.
I don't hate them, they are useful, but they can be annoying when you don't want to be bothered. I remember a girlfriend, Sabrina, whose mother had the uncanny ability to know exactly when to call................ . Eventually I found ways to get into her bag and shut the damn thing off, when I could.
Dave
|
What was once a symbol of the user's supposed importance, has now become a mere tether. Those that do not carry one have become the ones with status in many circles. Once exclusivity is gone, so goes the status associated with that exclusivity.
__________________
Dear Optimist: Unless life gives you water and sugar too, your lemonade will suck.
|
05-23-2011, 09:24 AM
|
|
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
|
|
You mean, I have status? Woo hoo!
Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
|
05-23-2011, 10:03 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 658
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander
So Dinnerjacket provides Chavez with some missiles, can you really see him pushing the button? Ten minutes later Venezuela and Iran cease to exist. Those two are not the sharpest knives in the drawer, but I doubt they are that stupid. If you think any U.S. president would not retaliate, the miltary would.
|
That's interesting merrylander. Are you saying that the military would retaliate without waiting for Presidential authority?
|
05-23-2011, 10:09 PM
|
|
Reformed Know-Nothing
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,913
|
|
"We have no evidence to support this claim and therefore no reason to believe the assertions made in the article are credible," the (State) department said in a statement.
http://articles.cnn.com/2011-05-21/w...on?_s=PM:WORLD
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
|
06-02-2011, 08:05 AM
|
|
Resident octogenarian
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Combwork
That's interesting merrylander. Are you saying that the military would retaliate without waiting for Presidential authority?
|
I think that there are people in the military who could not/would not refrain from retaliation no matter what.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.
|