|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
03-20-2018, 09:01 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,068
|
|
Depends on the church, quite a few wanted a venal self-identified unapologetic pussygrabbing profligate liar in the Oval.
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
|
03-20-2018, 09:11 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,213
|
|
|
03-20-2018, 11:28 AM
|
|
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980
JJ, can you tell me specifically, what "rights" you believe the 2nd amendment, as written in full, grants individuals minus the militia connection?
|
Since he doesn't appear to know, I'll tell you again. Self defense and being able to fight a tyrant who is taking over our nation, which Trump clearly isn't. These two rights remain until the Supremes sing otherwise.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
|
03-20-2018, 11:36 AM
|
|
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
Just saw this thread. Don't go to church much, do ya? If you did you'd know that many a call from many a pulpit, including last Sunday in my church, called for action on restriction of guns.
|
Interesting, until now I didn't perceive you as a gun worshipping redneck. But since you just implied being one who am I to argue.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Last edited by nailer; 03-20-2018 at 11:44 AM.
|
03-20-2018, 11:42 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,068
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer
Since he doesn't appear to know, I'll tell you again. Self defense and being able to fight a tyrant who is taking over our nation, which Trump clearly isn't. These two rights remain until the Supremes sing otherwise.
|
Scalia iirc said, the 2nd permits home defense with a handgun. Nothing else, afaik.
The tyranny bit is a false assumption, absent from the Second in word and intent. Armed insurrection against Federal authority is not a Constitunally granted protected right.
Trump is at least a would be tyrant as POTUS by demeanor.
His removal would be arguably justifiable by any rational judgement of ethical behavior.
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
|
03-20-2018, 12:01 PM
|
|
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
|
|
The tyranny bit isn't a false assumption and having the means at hand to fight a tyrant who has usurped Federal authority is why it's part of the second.
Would be doesn't matter, but is does. If we are ever in actual danger of being under a tyrant's boot, firearms would be an excellent tool in defending our homes. Pretty sure Scalia would concur.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Last edited by nailer; 03-20-2018 at 12:04 PM.
|
03-20-2018, 12:17 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,068
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer
The tyranny bit isn't a false assumption and having the means at hand to fight a tyrant who has usurped Federal authority is why it's part of the second.
Would be doesn't matter, but is does. If we are ever in actual danger of being under a tyrant's boot, firearms would be an excellent tool in defending our homes. Pretty sure Scalia would concur.
|
If that was the intent, it would have been part of the wording. It's just not there.
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
|
03-20-2018, 12:30 PM
|
|
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980
If that was the intent, it would have been part of the wording. It's just not there.
|
In other words, you don't believe we have the right to own arms. I know we do because the intent of the second goes beyond the need to arm a militia.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
|
03-20-2018, 01:01 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,068
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer
In other words, you don't believe we have the right to own arms. I know we do because the intent of the second goes beyond the need to arm a militia.
|
Potentially, everyone does under the second, including the village idiot and the county homicidal maniac by assumption.
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
|
03-20-2018, 01:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,068
|
|
Do we "need" a Constitutional amendment to own and operate motor vehicles. No, yet we aren't demanding onesuch, or need it to lawfully do so.
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.
|