|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
07-10-2010, 10:54 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal
well, let's go buy another gun!
|
Nah, just turn on the sprinklers and run a 120 VAC line to the doorknob.
They won't be back twice, even if they live through it!!!
Chas
|
07-10-2010, 01:06 PM
|
|
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
Here's an excerpt extracted from an Op-Ed piece by Rick Barber, the Alabama Teabagger running for Congress (link provided on recent post a few minutes ago):
"Though I'm not a veteran of politics, I've come to understand that arguments, and thus governments, move most often through fear.
Those on my side of the aisle seek to move the argument through fear of deficits, inflation, terrorism, socialism and the loss of individual liberty; those on the left through fears of global warming, poverty, racism, depression.
I don't bemoan the politics of fear.
It's natural to the polemic, and from my perspective, there is ample reason for it."
Good luck with changing the politics of fear.
|
Finn,
I may be a naive optimist, but I'm not going to look to an opportunist like that to define my world view. Reading his op-ed piece and seeing the quotes from his interview, I have concluded that he is not a nut. I certainly believe he doesn't understand much about constitutional law and economics, but I think he knows that he is using manipulative imagery to make a splash for his campaign. In other words, he is at least as much of a cynical opportunist as any other politician. If he wins, we will not only have another cynic in congress, but an unqualified one as well.
Regards,
D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|
07-10-2010, 02:10 PM
|
|
Area Man
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles
Nah, just turn on the sprinklers and run a 120 VAC line to the doorknob.
They won't be back twice, even if they live through it!!!
Chas
|
See, an inventive mind doesn't need firearms..........
I like your line of thinking, Chas. Even better than my "courtroom blender".
Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
|
07-12-2010, 08:59 AM
|
|
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
Eddie, ya still have me thinking on this one. It is interesting trying to determine where to draw the line between advocacy and partisanship. As I understand your comments, you aren't suggesting that we try to agree on everything, but that we don't have to be hatin' on those who disagree with us. (When my wife became a supervisor, I had to convince her that she didn't have to get mad at someone to reprimand or "counsel" them about inadequate performance.)
The disagreements are part of the fun here. From time to time, I have learned something from the disagreements - and altered my position. On the other hand, I want to state my position as well as possible, and that is going to require me to point out the errors (IMO) in the opposing position. A little biting humor helps make a point - but most here use that tool better than I do. Your main point is one that we can only wish the politicians and talking heads understood. It is OK to disagree disagreeably. (Jon Stewart once visited Crossfire and pleaded with them to set a better example of that.) I try to meet the standard you have articulated, but don't always succeed.
Regards,
D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|
07-12-2010, 09:13 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657
Eddie, ya still have me thinking on this one. It is interesting trying to determine where to draw the line between advocacy and partisanship. As I understand your comments, you aren't suggesting that we try to agree on everything, but that we don't have to be hatin' on those who disagree with us. (When my wife became a supervisor, I had to convince her that she didn't have to get mad at someone to reprimand or "counsel" them about inadequate performance.)
The disagreements are part of the fun here. From time to time, I have learned something from the disagreements - and altered my position. On the other hand, I want to state my position as well as possible, and that is going to require me to point out the errors (IMO) in the opposing position. A little biting humor helps make a point - but most here use that tool better than I do. Your main point is one that we can only wish the politicians and talking heads understood. It is OK to disagree disagreeably. (Jon Stewart once visited Crossfire and pleaded with them to set a better example of that.) I try to meet the standard you have articulated, but don't always succeed.
Regards,
D-Ray
|
I used to use anger as a tool. It enabled me to accomplish twice the work and allowed me to climb up on top of things which scared me shitless...always was afraid of heights.
But when you get mad, YOU lose...every time.
Chas
|
07-12-2010, 10:41 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657
(Jon Stewart once visited Crossfire and pleaded with them to set a better example of that.)
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmj6J...eature=related
John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.
|