Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Economy
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-03-2021, 12:20 AM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,577
Since $3 trillion is the plan, one can reasonably expect that it will evolve to say a $9 trillion reality. This implies more printing of fiat.


There is a big difference in the dollar's reach and spread from government spending in comparing the new deal era to now. For instance, road building once carried a crowd; not anymore.

Another significant difference re new deal era versus now: The new deal era - a dollar spent in America usually put Americans to work; now - the spent dollar (just looking at Walmart) seems to employ a significant amount of Chinese. That aspect won't change in the near to medium future.

A look at California's construction of a high-speed rail.
https://city-journal.org/high-costs-...igh-speed-rail
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-03-2021, 07:22 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,160
It's good to consider critically. I doubt if the sort of cost growth associated with weapon system programs with ambitious technological goals will be seen here. Speaking of defense, the truly radical ( in our lifetimes) part is spending on this level not for military purposes, but for direct civilian benefit. Defense spending was often justified in part by it's domestic economic benefit, we should get a lot more bang for the buck in that respect here.

It is high time to reverse decades of increasing austerity in domestic spending. The Reagan dictum that 'government is the problem' is basically a lie, serving the money-hoarding class.
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-09-2021, 03:09 PM
Chicks Chicks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 13,345
Wall Street roars to new records ahead of earnings season

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock...221441259.html

...because, of course, ol' "Sleepy Joe" is a commie who's going to destroy the economy!
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-09-2021, 10:08 PM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,577
What explains the widening gap between Wall Street and Main Street.

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/...in-street?rl=1
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-15-2021, 08:45 AM
Chicks Chicks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 13,345
Stocks jump, S&P 500 and Dow hit record highs after retail sales, jobless claims top estimates

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock...221220587.html

Retail sales WAY up, jobless claims WAY down. Main street recovering just fine. Because of ol' Commie Joe, lol. What WILL the Repubes do? ROFL.
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-16-2021, 06:04 PM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,577
How fast is the economy recovering?

What is its character?

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...y-coronavirus/
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-17-2021, 02:18 AM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion View Post
What explains the widening gap between Wall Street and Main Street.

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/...in-street?rl=1
Ignorance.

Too many American workers do not take their 401k or investing seriously. They don't understand how the stock market works because they have not been adequately educated and consequently, don't trust it. They under invest if they invest at all. I work with a bunch of guys, younger Baby Boomers in their 50s and 60s, who've waited until NOW to start worrying about retirement. If retirement age is only 5 years away...........buddy, it's too late. So they're all dumping petty cash, $100 or so here and there into these gimmicky bitcoin cryptocurrency stocks and hoping to make stupid money, fast. Either that or they're finding excuses to collect disability. Makes me sad.

I see big problems coming when all these people get too old for work and have done absolutely ZERO to prepare.

Me? I started putting everything I could in my first 401k in 1991. Today, I'm 57, have two 401ks worth a total of approximately $750k and plan to retire at 60. They want to know what my "secret" is.............
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-17-2021, 07:22 AM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 6,096
I wish I had put even more into my 401k. Even as it was there was enough there that when I had to retire early on disability I could pay off my house.
__________________
Joe whupped him before and he'll do it once more.
BIDEN/HARRIS IN 2024
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-17-2021, 07:50 AM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,208
The fact is for more then a few the 401K when enacted was meant as a supplement for a employer backed retirement. Never a standalone, what it has become for the majority of workers now.
Then add the stagnant wages and rising costs the 401K is used as a emergency source of funds.

We were lucky to both have a old employer supplied retirement along with 401K. Never need to "borrow" from the 401K and fully funded the accounts. Thank you organized labor once again!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-17-2021, 12:37 PM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerets View Post
The fact is for more then a few the 401K when enacted was meant as a supplement for a employer backed retirement. Never a standalone, what it has become for the majority of workers now.
Then add the stagnant wages and rising costs the 401K is used as a emergency source of funds.
Essentially correct!

The basic idea of a pension was to save workers from themselves and the vagaries of an economy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.