Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2012, 12:01 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,920
Principles

My hackles go up every time I hear the feckin' Teabaggers and the GOP talking about their unwillingness to "compromise their principles." Are they thereby saying that anyone who believes differently than they do has no principles? Not only do 50% of Americans not share the GOP's "principles," they have their own which often differ.

Different principles inform the policy positions of both parties and their respective constituencies. If both refuse to "compromise their principles," there will never been any compromises whatsoever.

In short, in politics the principle of refusing to compromise your principles is a recipe for failure. I don't find anything the least bit respectable about such intransigence.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-09-2012, 12:28 PM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Well to start with a horse's rear end has more principles than a tea bagger.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-09-2012, 12:37 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
I only know one tea party individual fairly closely. She's a good neighbor.

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2012, 01:17 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
My hackles go up every time I hear the feckin' Teabaggers and the GOP talking about their unwillingness to "compromise their principles." Are they thereby saying that anyone who believes differently than they do has no principles? Not only do 50% of Americans not share the GOP's "principles," they have their own which often differ.

Different principles inform the policy positions of both parties and their respective constituencies. If both refuse to "compromise their principles," there will never been any compromises whatsoever.

In short, in politics the principle of refusing to compromise your principles is a recipe for failure. I don't find anything the least bit respectable about such intransigence.
What "principles" has Obama compromised?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2012, 01:56 PM
icenine's Avatar
icenine icenine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
What "principles" has Obama compromised?
Most people from your state disagree.....
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2012, 02:15 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
He didn't try to shove single payer, or card check down your throat.

(But he should have.)

Regards,
Dave
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
He allowed the Bush tax cuts to survive in toto, compromising the principle that those who have the most should share a little more. He compromised on finding a reduction in the deficit without raising revenues. He compromised on keeping GITMO open, because of those asserting the "principle" of NIBY. He has been a centrist president.

Regards,

D-Ray
Obama could not get agreement among DEMOCRATS for single payer. There wasn't a need for any Repub votes for the Dems to pass whatever version of health care reform they wanted. As for card check, the Dems took too long with health reform to take up single payer when they had the votes for it.

As far as the tax cuts, find me a majority of Dems would would have voted in favor of a tax increase ahead of the 2010 mid term elections. Obama didn't have support in his own party for that.

How was there a compromise on budget cuts without revenues? Again, no support in his own party for revenue increases. Both sides failure to agree got us to the sequester which both parties are actively trying to avoid.

Obama didn't compromise on GITMO. He simply had no place to send many of the GITMO detainees, and some of those that were repatriated have reportedly resumed their terrorist activity.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2012, 02:21 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Obama could not get agreement among DEMOCRATS for single payer. There wasn't a need for any Repub votes for the Dems to pass whatever version of health care reform they wanted. As for card check, the Dems took too long with health reform to take up single payer when they had the votes for it.

As far as the tax cuts, find me a majority of Dems would would have voted in favor of a tax increase ahead of the 2010 mid term elections. Obama didn't have support in his own party for that.

How was there a compromise on budget cuts without revenues? Again, no support in his own party for revenue increases. Both sides failure to agree got us to the sequester which both parties are actively trying to avoid.

Obama didn't compromise on GITMO. He simply had no place to send many of the GITMO detainees, and some of those that were repatriated have reportedly resumed their terrorist activity.
All under Bush.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_o...d_to_terrorism

And he DID have places to send them. There were more than a few places willing to accept them in their local correctional facilities. It was Republicans in Congress who blocked the transfers.

John
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2012, 03:10 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,237
No comment, Whell?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-09-2012, 01:22 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
He didn't try to shove single payer, or card check down your throat.

(But he should have.)

Regards,
Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2012, 01:53 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
He allowed the Bush tax cuts to survive in toto, compromising the principle that those who have the most should share a little more. He compromised on finding a reduction in the deficit without raising revenues. He compromised on keeping GITMO open, because of those asserting the "principle" of NIBY. He has been a centrist president.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.