Rosenstein - "Don't beleive anonymous sources."

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

Hate to break this to you, but your grammar in sentence one above is not correct. "yourself" is not correctly used. "yourself" is a reflexive pronoun, but it is not being used reflexively in the above sentence.

Damn, I guess that means that you're not able to form meaningful opinions. Sucks to be you.

Says the guy who spells "believe" as "beleive" in the thread title.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Wrong as usual. Either way is correct. Keep trying, dumbass!

https://english.stackexchange.com/qu...-like-yourself

No, it's not. Your info isn't accurate.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

No, the called the reporting methodology "bogus". He did not confirm or deny what was being investigated.

Kushner is currently meeting with leaders in the Middle East. I kinda hope someone from Russia shows up while he's over there. It would send the media into hysterics.

What the whell are you talking about? If Rosenstein did not confirm or deny the report, most people will take it as an affirmation. And several other non-fake news organizations are reporting and that usually means the information is verified.

Kushner is hiding out in the ME doing inconsequential work for which he is not even qualified let alone authorized. As if he is capable of negotiating peace where all others have failed.

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Says the guy who spells "believe" as "beleive" in the thread title.

You've competely run out of anything meaningful to add when you resort to pointing out typos.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

What the whell are you talking about? If Rosenstein did not confirm or deny the report, most people will take it as an affirmation.

No, "most people" would not. They'd would do so at their own risk, or in service to their own agendas. Most law enforcement agencies don't comment on on-going investigation, and many don't confirm or deny what they may or may not be investigating.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

No, "most people" would not. They'd would do so at their own risk, or in service to their own agendas. Most law enforcement agencies don't comment on on-going investigation, and many don't confirm or deny what they may or may not be investigating.

You've been trying to make the argument that he said a specific WashPost article about an ongoing investigation is BS and then you say that he wouldn't comment on an ongoing investigation. Which is it? You really need to slow down and understand that you're spinning in circles defending the indefensible.

[donquixote99]

He is Winston Smith, at his work. What is past, even 5 minutes past, goes down the memory hole. There is only the truth of the moment--or the facade of argument of the moment....

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

No, "most people" would not. They'd would do so at their own risk, or in service to their own agendas. Most law enforcement agencies don't comment on on-going investigation, and many don't confirm or deny what they may or may not be investigating.

Sorry I disagree. If any number of legitimate news organizations are reporting the same story, I among most others will believe it as true regardless of the naysayers. Reputable legitimate news organizations tend to verify their stories before they publish it.

So as hard as you seem to be trying to call NYT and WaPo fake news organizations parroting your leaded aka LIC, just pissing in the wind. Eventually you will start wearing the smell.

[+48v]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Every day is a bad hair day for our Dear Leader.

As John Oliver puts it, "Trumps hair resembles the wispy pubes of an aging Yeti."

[donquixote99]

John Oliver has quite the flair for description.