GOP Wins the Contest for Number of God References in their Platform

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by mezz

Oh stop being such a baby. I really didn't have a problem ommitting God from the platform. But putting God back in now after some criticism just looks weak.

You aren't worth the keystrokes. Crickets are the only chorus you deserve.

[mezz]

Originally Posted by bobabode

You aren't worth the keystrokes. Crickets are the only chorus you deserve.

I do only expect your soreness to increase as the signals continue to align that you are indeed handily (and deservedly) losing this election.

[bobabode]

"-\\\"

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by mezz

I do only expect your soreness to increase as the signals continue to align that you are indeed handily (and deservedly) losing this election.

You got this from Nancy Reagan's astrologer?

John

[BlueStreak]

Originally Posted by Boreas

You got this from Nancy Reagan's astrologer?

John

Speaking of Nancy, did you see where she wil sonn be portrayed by none other than "Hanoi" Jane Fonda herself?

Dave

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by BlueStreak

Speaking of Nancy, did you see where she wil sonn be portrayed by none other than "Hanoi" Jane Fonda herself?

Dave

Yeah, I did. I'm sure Fonda is enough of a pro to play the role straight but St. Ronnie's order must be pretty incensed.

John

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by BlueStreak

Speaking of Nancy, did you see where she wil sonn be portrayed by none other than "Hanoi" Jane Fonda herself?

Dave

I can't wait for the Rushite's reactions. That will send them into a jibbering dance of underwhelming proportions.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by mezz

I do only expect your soreness to increase as the signals continue to align that you are indeed handily (and deservedly) losing this election.

"Copyright infringement is illegal. Politicalchat.org will enforce the law. Please do not post an article in its entirety. When posting copyrighted material, please use small sections or link to the article. When posting copyrighted material you must give credit to the author in your post. You are responsible for including links/credit, regardless of how you originally came across the material."
from the rules of the board posted by Grumpy.

What part of this do you not understand Mezz? I'm not really surprised that you came back, you just can't help yourself. You have thoroughly discredited yourself. Let me disabuse you of any notion that I will engage in any conversation with you at all, it will not happen. My only direct reply in the future will be "-///" which means you are not worth the keystrokes. The quotation marks are commentary on your character. In closing, do yourself a big favor and find another forum where they aren't aware of your shortcomings.

[CarlV]

Originally Posted by mezz

I do only expect your soreness to increase as the signals continue to align that you are indeed handily (and deservedly) losing this election.