Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander
Did anyone see the front page article in WaPo about all these uses of excessive force? The cop is rarely found guilty.
|
Because it's rarely excessive.
For example, the pandering in the initial post about the guy "surrendering?" Until you are submitted and
in cuffs, you're a threat. (Meaning? Initial poster knows jack shit about such situations.) Multiple times, I've witnessed someone give surrender signals then, once on the ground, do everything in their power to NOT be cuffed. That's NOT surrendering and is what got Rodney King, appropriately, handled with significant force due his actions.
As for slip and capture, it's a pretty neat legal trick -- with plausibility -- especially if you're a Reserve Deputy without the repetition of the daily guys. Further, in an intense situation, mistakes occur.
But in a naturally calm state it would be somewhat difficult to mistake a Taser for a duty weapon. In general, the Taser is half the weight but more front loaded, typically carried lower if on the same side or cross draw weak side, and (what I am familiar with) has a big yellow tip in aiming line of sight.
The ONLY way to sell this defense is to sell panic.
It happens but then you bring everything else you did into question as you cannot panic and be rational at the same time. When it all goes to hell due to an offender? That's where training takes over but a Reserve Deputy just isn't going to possess that level of diligence due to status.