Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2022, 08:12 AM
Pio1980's Avatar
Pio1980 Pio1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,070
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
One might ask, "what is the stated purpose of the 2nd amendment in the era of standing uniformly trained and armed defenses"?
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Last edited by Pio1980; 06-01-2022 at 08:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-01-2022, 09:20 AM
Pio1980's Avatar
Pio1980 Pio1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,070
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Was this a right granted to secure a nation, or the states individually?
Wording seems deliberately aimed at the security of states, "security" undefined. I suppose it leaves it to the state's to define whatever they deem security as an enumerated right. Perhaps a right to armed insurrection against due process to secure their "rights" as they see them.
Federal authority can be tyrranical, or the defense against local authoritarian tyranny.
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Last edited by Pio1980; 06-01-2022 at 04:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-01-2022, 09:58 PM
BigElCat's Avatar
BigElCat BigElCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: South of KC, Kansas
Posts: 1,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980 View Post
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Was this a right granted to secure a nation, or the states individually?
Wording seems deliberately aimed at the security of states, "security" undefined.
In part, it was written to appease the soldiers who had fought in the American Revolution and then did not get paid for their service as promised.

It only secured the Federal Government from an armed mutiny against it, after the Revolutionary army had been disbanded.

States also had to defend themselves against Native Americans.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...g-fathers-did/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-2022, 09:44 AM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 6,123
That well regulated militia is something that doesn't exist in this country in today's world. If the gubmint deems you too dangerous to have around they're going to come at you with enough force to solve the problem. The White folk aren't going to join you and rise up against "the government" either. If the Fed gubmint doesn't think you're worth the trouble they leave you alone. Now as far as a foreign adversary invading. Really?
This Second Amendment "need" for a well armed militia excuse for having guns is malarkey Just as much as that slippery slope to taking all our guns fearmongering. Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti-gun I'm just anti-NRA influencing the government against the will of the people.
__________________
Joe whupped him before and he'll do it once more.
BIDEN/HARRIS IN 2024
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-02-2022, 05:42 AM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,214
At the time of the writing of the 2nd. The cost of keeping and maintaining a standing army being considered. Beyond the means of this expanding country to maintain. Hence the need and want for a citizen militia. One to be controlled by the state and local government in times of need.

Not anything like the dress up wanna be Rambo's playing Billy Bad @ss.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-02-2022, 07:22 AM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 6,123
Angry ANOTHER MASS SHOOTING, this time in Tulsa

Four People Killed in Shooting at Tulsa Medical Center

Quote:
A man carrying a rifle and a handgun opened fire in a medical office building in Tulsa, Okla., on Wednesday afternoon
Waiting for some idiot Repube to call for arming hospital workers now.
__________________
Joe whupped him before and he'll do it once more.
BIDEN/HARRIS IN 2024
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-03-2022, 10:39 AM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 6,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickeyM View Post
Four People Killed in Shooting at Tulsa Medical Center



Waiting for some idiot Repube to call for arming hospital workers now.
It's been reported that the shooter who went there to kill his doctor, and anyone that got in his way, bought his weapon right before going to the hospital to kill him. Maybe this shooting could have been avoided if there was a so-called cooling off period between going to order a rifle and actually taking possession of it like with hand guns?
__________________
Joe whupped him before and he'll do it once more.
BIDEN/HARRIS IN 2024
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-03-2022, 11:29 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickeyM View Post
It's been reported that the shooter who went there to kill his doctor, and anyone that got in his way, bought his weapon right before going to the hospital to kill him. Maybe this shooting could have been avoided if there was a so-called cooling off period between going to order a rifle and actually taking possession of it like with hand guns?
IMHO, cooling off period is another bandaid on a severed head intervention.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-02-2022, 08:08 AM
BigElCat's Avatar
BigElCat BigElCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: South of KC, Kansas
Posts: 1,445
Our founding fathers rebelled against the English Crown because they didn't want to pay taxes.

Then they didn't pay the soldiers for their effort.

It's ironic that the first action of the standing Federal Army, once it was established, was to act as revenuers. They went after moonshiners to collect taxes.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-02-2022, 01:27 PM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 6,123
Just imagine if they had representation for their taxation.
__________________
Joe whupped him before and he'll do it once more.
BIDEN/HARRIS IN 2024
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.