Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Economy
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-16-2011, 10:04 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Let's see. Are none of these individuals responsible or credible enough in your estimation?

Kent Conrad
Joe Manchin
Amy Klobuchar
Mark Udall

They have all either suggested they would favor enacting spending cuts tied to raising the debt ceiling, or at least suggested that they're undecided (political speak for I'm in favor of it, but just don't think it would be politically expedient to say so).
I'm talking about responsible, credible people not currently serving in Congress. Those serving in Congress at the moment are concerned about their next election, plain and simple; not the debt, deficit or anything else.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-16-2011, 10:23 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
I'm talking about responsible, credible people not currently serving in Congress. Those serving in Congress at the moment are concerned about their next election, plain and simple; not the debt, deficit or anything else.
Druckenmiller's not credible or responsible either?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...s_opinion_main
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-16-2011, 10:40 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
I'm talking about responsible, credible people not currently serving in Congress. Those serving in Congress at the moment are concerned about their next election, plain and simple; not the debt, deficit or anything else.
How 'bout a Ph.D. at George Mason?

http://reason.com/archives/2011/02/0...the-debt-ceili
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-16-2011, 10:43 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
I'm talking about responsible, credible people not currently serving in Congress. Those serving in Congress at the moment are concerned about their next election, plain and simple; not the debt, deficit or anything else.
So, by the way, why should we listen to those members of Congress or those that serve at the pleasure of the President? They are also political animals, concerned about the next election cycle. If we shouldn't listen to those who are suggesting that we can survive a technical default with limited impact, why should we listen to those who suggest that the consequences will be "catastrophic"?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.