Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Religion & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old 07-06-2011, 03:47 PM
flacaltenn's Avatar
flacaltenn flacaltenn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,145
If you're so "Abso-friggin'-lutely!" about Article VI.3 -- then how's cum the 1st thing I hear from lefties parsing candidates is "how religious they are" or "what are their biblical beliefs"?

No religious test -- means religious beliefs are also "not relevent" to holding office. Protects Bachmann and Atheists as well. (and especially difficult cases like Kennedys and Romneys..) Taking the oath to uphold the Constitution is more important and OUGHT to be enforced after the swearing-in.

But given your personal nightmares -- I can understand. So I'll help you out when I can to make certain that govt power is never usurped for the purpose of "religious abuse" of any kind. I just can't cuddle up to AU because they fall on the wrong side of a lot of important arguments that I have to win. For instance school choice, and the true (unfiltered, uncensored) celebration of multicultural roots..
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.