Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2014, 05:57 AM
barbara's Avatar
barbara barbara is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,172
The Age Question

http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/25/politi...tml?c=politics


Is age a critical factor when considering a presidential candidate?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2014, 06:10 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Other than what the Constitution requires not really, except I should think mental age is important. There are senior members on this board that I would not entrust with a tricycle let alone the presidency. I am not even certain I would trust myself.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2014, 07:23 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,169
For each candidate, there should be a long-form, unscripted interview. then you could judge based on the individual, not the number.

Whether there will be such an interview is doubtful, though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2014, 08:47 AM
icenine's Avatar
icenine icenine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,538
I do not think it matters as long as she or he is healthy. Reagan was pretty old and McCain is obviously capable of leadership. In this age if infirmity becomes an issue we will see it almost immediately.

If either Hillary or Biden run I think they will have a younger running mate. I would not be surprised if Hillary just does one term. And women last longer than us men
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-26-2014, 08:53 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
I think 35 is too young from the standpoint of maturity and experience but, at the upper limit, I don't think you can safely generalize.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-26-2014, 09:03 AM
4-2-7 4-2-7 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,454
Yes too young of an age is more detrimental than an elder of experience.

Looking at higher ages I would need to know the health and stamina of the individual. We have all watched the Presidency beat down the individual over time. I thought Bush got stronger over time and look at him today mountain biking and running.

Hillary's health I would defiantly question. She was beat down as SS doing nothing but traveling. She looked young and vibrant in 2008 until her emotional breakdown towards the end of the primaries. After her term a SS she went into hiding because she was so run down, (oh and Benghazi) I don't see her being able to handle the job, no stamina and her health will be a hindrance.

Last edited by 4-2-7; 04-26-2014 at 09:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-26-2014, 09:08 AM
barbara's Avatar
barbara barbara is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine View Post
I do not think it matters as long as she or he is healthy. Reagan was pretty old and McCain is obviously capable of leadership. In this age if infirmity becomes an issue we will see it almost immediately.



If either Hillary or Biden run I think they will have a younger running mate. I would not be surprised if Hillary just does one term. And women last longer than us men

I agree that health might be a consideration but I don't think that applies only to older candidates. If I remember correctly, JFK had health problems and he was relatively young.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-26-2014, 09:15 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara View Post
I agree that health might be a consideration but I don't think that applies only to older candidates. If I remember correctly, JFK had health problems and he was relatively young.
He had Addison's disease and also severe chronic back pain from injuries he received in the "PT-109" incident.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-26-2014, 09:24 AM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
Physical health would be less important to me than mental acuity. As age advances, individuals can experience difficulties due to early onset of dementia, Alzheimers, etc. and associated memory losses, lapses, perceptual issues and so on.

Although some seem to remain remarkably sharp to their final days.

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-26-2014, 09:44 AM
Pio1980's Avatar
Pio1980 Pio1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,065
Mental acuity vs likelihood of completing the commitment in reasonably good health.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.