JonL:
I find it a little strange that I spent most of the time talking about fuel cells, and hydrogen and nuclear, but the one thing you're dinging me on is the socialist comment.
Don't really want to do that one now.. But yeah, I know socialists have the best of intentions in forming a better, fairer society. But they do that by substituting the wisdom and compassion of GOVT which I personally find to be a suboptimal choice and in fact that method naturally REDUCES the choices that you and I have. The fact that our Fed govt has not even demonstrated the ability to successfully manage Universal SS for one lifetime, provide tamper free elections, or secure the borders from crime and disease should worry statists just a tad. Don't really want them over-extending their basis incompetence to toilets and lightbulbs. Not JUST a matter of "filtering" or perceptions. It's a personal dedication to LIMITING the functions of govt to stuff they can and should handle well.
You say..
Quote:
To imply that socialists are motivated by centralization and consolidation of power within some intellectual elite is simply a reflection of your filters and not reality.
|
Not just SOME intellectual elite, that would be just a club (or the normal univ faculty lounge). But the elite I was picturing would be more like the appointed heads of DOE, USFS, BLM, Treasury, DOJ, ect. You get the picture. Oh and a sympathetic Congress and Executive Branch. Say THAT kind of elite. Because you can't discuss political philosophies without the power structure to enforce them. So it IS reality.
BTW: I dropped the socialist bomb in an entirely proper context. And if you read the one-liner, it was in reference to centralizing control of the energy market into govt hands. You can't deny that this is at the top of list for socialist or progressive politics. Or can you? Some people are queezy about actually identifying socialism when it exists because it comes a little too close to politicians and movements that they believe they favor. I just use the proper terminology whenever possible - doesn't give me heartburn...
I'm really more interested in the actual enviromental elements of our energy policy and the technology behind our options such as they are. Like I said, that's my favorite thing to discuss.
So I actually spent time responding to you back in another thread at :
http://www.politicalchat.org/showpos...1&postcount=30 about small business and ecology. And at:
http://www.politicalchat.org/showpos...5&postcount=33 about your disbelief that those green credits largely accounted for GE and it's zero tax statement. I thought you'd find those interesting. But maybe not. I think GE getting more than $100 per appliance sold just because it's Energy Star would affect your "morality filters". But maybe not..