Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-11-2009, 07:35 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post

Seriously, though, the problem isn't capitalism. Capitalism's fine. It's unregulated capitalism that causes problems.
Why don't people understand this John?

It is very frustrating to see my fellow countrymen fail to recognize this distinction.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-11-2009, 07:38 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by doucanoe View Post


I apply logic and reason.



When?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-11-2009, 09:02 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
So how much regulation is enough? Folks are decrying the lack of manufacturing here and at the same time arguing for higher taxes and more regulatory burden and government interference!

And it is interference, unless some bureaucrat can make business decisions better than some guy who's been in business for years.

Government takes care of itself, is greedy and powerhungry.

The CO2 is a good example. We all exhale CO2 - we are apparently toxic and need to be regulated for our own good.

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-11-2009, 09:03 AM
HatchetJack's Avatar
HatchetJack HatchetJack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal View Post
Ok let me understand this.
You are concerned about manufacturing jobs yet support the party that is synonymous with big business and big business is the one that is shutting down manufacturing here in order to source overseas, right?

What's wrong with this picture?
What's wrong with this picture is that your point of view sent them packing
in the first place. But go ahead, bite the hand that feeds you.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-11-2009, 09:09 AM
HatchetJack's Avatar
HatchetJack HatchetJack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
I wonder just how many of the posters here have actually been in any European countries for extended periods? I suspect the disparagement of their lifestyles and economies comes from the same sources as all of the so called failings of Canada's single Payer plan.

Having lived in Canada for 53 years and having travelled extensively in Europe I think I am in a good position to judge the quality of life in many of those countries, and frankly the jingoism of "only in America" is getting rather old. I did not see any poor people in The Netherlands, or Denmark, or Germany, even France and Britain seemed to have people who, while less well off, were adequately fed and housed.

Of course we could apply that phrase to the unfettered capitalism that nearly brough down the whole world economy. Odd though how Canada's banks did not need propping up, could it be that their mortgage system actually works? You do know who the TD in TDAmeritrade really is don't you?

When laws are truly designed to provide fair and equal treatment it is a win-win situation. When they are designed to enrich one group at the expense of all the others collapse is inevitable.
I respect your opinion Merrylander but could it be that these countries you
refer to have a lot less "baggage" than ours? Lets go roundup a few million
of our no gooders and ship them up to Canada or Denmark and see how well they make out.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-11-2009, 10:09 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
They (most other 1st world countries) also lean on us for national security. Since we pay for it they have more money to spend.

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-11-2009, 11:12 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack View Post
I respect your opinion Merrylander but could it be that these countries you
refer to have a lot less "baggage" than ours? Lets go roundup a few million
of our no gooders and ship them up to Canada or Denmark and see how well they make out.

Ever wonder why we have no-gooders and they don't? Maybe what you call baggage they simply reclaimed.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-11-2009, 11:13 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
They (most other 1st world countries) also lean on us for national security. Since we pay for it they have more money to spend.

Pete
Seems to me the Japanese want our air base gone, maybe others feel the same way. Canada had a whole ground support squdron or two in Germany. Unfortunately they were flying F-104 widowmakers since Diefenbaker decided Canada would not be a nuclear power and converted the F-104s from delivering tactical nuke to flying ground support, hence the name widowmaker.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt

Last edited by merrylander; 12-11-2009 at 11:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-11-2009, 12:40 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack View Post
What's wrong with this picture is that your point of view sent them packing
in the first place. But go ahead, bite the hand that feeds you.
what sent them packing was not wanting to pay you a fair wage.

Fact.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-11-2009, 12:46 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
So how much regulation is enough? Folks are decrying the lack of manufacturing here and at the same time arguing for higher taxes and more regulatory burden and government interference!
What regulations are causing this corporate greed?

Quote:
And it is interference, unless some bureaucrat can make business decisions better than some guy who's been in business for years.
Which business is the government interested in making decisions for?

Quote:
Government takes care of itself, is greedy and powerhungry.
LMAO, come on. That's just plain silly. There is no force on the planet more greedy than American big business.

Quote:
The CO2 is a good example. We all exhale CO2 - we are apparently toxic and need to be regulated for our own good.

Pete
Sarah would be proud

not one accurate statement
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.