The debasing of American politics

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by merrylander

As I have posted before the 'liar' badge was hung on her by William Safire in an article he wrote about Hillary - and which was later proven to be completely false with not one single item of fact in it.

And the "Under Bosnia Sniper Fire" ?

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by merrylander

As I have posted before the 'liar' badge was hung on her by William Safire in an article he wrote about Hillary - and which was later proven to be completely false with not one single item of fact in it.

She lied about her email server repeatedly.

[whell]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Honestly, Whell, how difficult is if for you to watch the nominee of your party behaving the way he is now? I know that you will try to deflect by raising accusations against Bill Clinton, but focus for a minute. Don't you fear for what his candidacy is doing to your party?

...apparently about as much as you care about the character deficits of the nominee of your party.

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by whell

...apparently about as much as you care about the character deficits of the nominee of your party.

Lame, but not surprising. I should have known better than to expect you to answer a question with even a hint of sincerity.

And your answer was absolutely a false equivalency. Even a shill must cringe a little bit when trying to compare Trump to a real human being.

But you know what? Come November, instead of trying to determine what shreds are left of my party, I will be looking forward to continued dominance in presidential politics.

[whell]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Lame, but not surprising. I should have known better than to expect you to answer a question with even a hint of sincerity.

And your answer was absolutely a false equivalency. Even a shill must cringe a little bit when trying to compare Trump to a real human being.

But you know what? Come November, instead of trying to determine what shreds are left of my party, I will be looking forward to continued dominance in presidential politics.

Here's a hint of sincerity for you. Its now pretty obvious that the media colludes with the Dems. If Podesta's emails aren't proof enough, here's a reminder that the media is more than willing to run without facts if they can develop a hit piece in the middle of an election cycle.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...021903112.html

They're doing it again this time. Sincerely, this is Hillary and her friends in the media "going low". And they do it quite often. They tried to do it to Bush Sr. As pointed out above, they tried to do it to McCain. They tried it on Gingrich in 2012. Now, you might not think much of Gingrich, but there's no way that Clinton would have been asked this question like this leading off a debate. The media was dragged to the discussion of Clinton's treatment of women kicking and screaming, and they still don't give his accusers any notice.

In my opinion, Gringrich handled this perfectly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj7OHEnz9KE

I hope Trump finds this video and takes some notes. I don't think there's any question that this crap will be brought up on Weds night. How do I know it? Because if the Democrat party's associates in the media are nothing else, they are consistent.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

Here's a hint of sincerity for you. Its now pretty obvious that the media colludes with the Dems. If Podesta's emails aren't proof enough, here's a reminder that the media is more than willing to run without facts if they can develop a hit piece in the middle of an election cycle.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...021903112.html

They're doing it again this time. Sincerely, this is Hillary and her friends in the media "going low". And they do it quite often. They tried to do it to Bush Sr. As pointed out above, they tried to do it to McCain. They tried it on Gingrich in 2012. Now, you might not think much of Gingrich, but there's no way that Clinton would have been asked this question like this leading off a debate. The media was dragged to the discussion of Clinton's treatment of women kicking and screaming, and they still don't give his accusers any notice.

In my opinion, Gringrich handled this perfectly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj7OHEnz9KE

I hope Trump finds this video and takes some notes. I don't think there's any question that this crap will be brought up on Weds night. How do I know it? Because if the Democrat party's associates in the media are nothing else, they are consistent.

Fox News is now part of the media cabal supporting Clinton? Seriously??

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by whell

Here's a hint of sincerity for you. Its now pretty obvious that the media colludes with the Dems. If Podesta's emails aren't proof enough, here's a reminder that the media is more than willing to run without facts if they can develop a hit piece in the middle of an election cycle.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...021903112.html

They're doing it again this time. Sincerely, this is Hillary and her friends in the media "going low". And they do it quite often. They tried to do it to Bush Sr. As pointed out above, they tried to do it to McCain. They tried it on Gingrich in 2012. Now, you might not think much of Gingrich, but there's no way that Clinton would have been asked this question like this leading off a debate. The media was dragged to the discussion of Clinton's treatment of women kicking and screaming, and they still don't give his accusers any notice.

In my opinion, Gringrich handled this perfectly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj7OHEnz9KE

I hope Trump finds this video and takes some notes. I don't think there's any question that this crap will be brought up on Weds night. How do I know it? Because if the Democrat party's associates in the media are nothing else, they are consistent.

Well, you make it obvious that you got the candidate you deserve, and I wish you well with the shreds of your party.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

...apparently about as much as you care about the character deficits of the nominee of your party.

Just to be clear, whose character deficits are you referring to again in this discussion?

[donquixote99]

Ha! Come the Trump revolution, you'll find Whell online, somewhere, explaining why we all had to be shot.

[whell]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Ha! Come the Trump revolution, you'll find Whell online, somewhere, explaining why we all had to be shot.

You're a stitch, Don. But wasn't that you spinning for Hillary in the Saudi / Qatar thread?