Trumps is in!

[Dondilion]

Huma will always be a target because of her Muslim connection.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huma_Abedin

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

Huma will always be a target because of her Muslim connection.

Anyone choosing to marry (or stay married to) Anthony Wiener and choosing to remain attached at the hip to HRC (under a dubious employment arrangement), not to mention being in line for a major White House staff position should Hillary win, certainly deserves a bit of scrutiny.

Having spent 25 years of my career working with and around high level political appointees in DC, there's but a scant few I'd trust as far as I could throw them. With few exceptions, they're as ethically challenged as they are ambitious.

[Rajoo]

If Hillary's email fiasco does not lead her to any serious legal problems, her relationship with Huma will exploited to the hilt. Her employment arrangement working for Hillary at State while moonlighting should more than raise eyebrows.

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by Boreas

No argument but it excuses nothing that Trump said. He and his supporters are uncouth hate-filled morons.

Speaking of hate, that's all that is spewed from you on this board. Must be hard to look in the miror every day for you,

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

Huma will always be a target because of her Muslim connection.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huma_Abedin

True that.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by finnbow

No doubt about it, but one doesn't need to feed them live ammo. Huma had a decidedly unusual employment arrangement, rife with conflicts of interests, as Hillary's right-hand-gal at State.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...74b_story.html

The State Department didn't see any conflicts.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

Speaking of hate, that's all that is spewed from you on this board. Must be hard to look in the miror every day for you,

There you go again, Dan. I'll invite you to read the rules again to refresh your memory.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by bobabode

There you go again, Dan. I'll invite you to read the rules again to refresh your memory.

Don't pay him any mind, Bob. It's just the Tar Baby doing what Tar Babies do.

You'd think he's learn, though, after multiple vacations here and on AK.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by bobabode

The State Department didn't see any conflicts.

Wouldn't you think Your Highness HRC would be having an easier time if she did not create these conflicts during her tenure in the State Department, especially if she had her eye on the WH? She could have been concentrating on getting a political makeover. She could have spun Benghazi and made herself look like a victim (hint: women's vote).

It's quite possible that she surrounds herself with incompetent people and how would this be any different if she does win the presidency?

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by BeamOn

Wouldn't you think Your Highness HRC would be having an easier time if she did not create these conflicts during her tenure in the State Department, especially if she had her eye on the WH? She could have been concentrating on getting a political makeover. She could have spun Benghazi and made herself look like a victim (hint: women's vote).

It's quite possible that she surrounds herself with incompetent people and how would this be any different if she does win the presidency?

Meh, I've watched the Republicans making mountains out of molehills for twenty five years with the Clintons. Every single one of them has flamed out at the cost of millions upon millions upon millions of dollars in taxpayer's money.

So much for the conservatives being well, conservative.

Benghazi? Sheesh, even a Republican controlled congressional committee found nothing wrong.