|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
08-04-2010, 08:56 PM
|
Abby Normal
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
Back to the OP. Even though this ruling is correct IMHO and foreshadows where things will ultimately end up in this country, this is but a small skirmish and maybe only a temporary victory in the culture wars. The GOP will do what it can to retain it as a wedge issue.
|
This will be settled with the supremes and Kennedy will be the deciding vote.
|
08-05-2010, 07:33 AM
|
|
Resident octogenarian
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
|
|
The 9th circuit court may rule in its favour, but then it goes to our esteemed SCOTUS where Scalia and his buddies will vote it down.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
|
08-05-2010, 08:36 AM
|
|
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
|
|
Thank Goodness the will of the people has been overturned.
Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
|
08-05-2010, 08:58 AM
|
|
Reformed Know-Nothing
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,907
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete
Thank Goodness the will of the people has been overturned.
Pete
|
True dat, as it was with the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act. The tendency for California to address controversial issues through referenda is where the problem lies. Remember Prop 13?
Representative government is supposed to protect us from the ignorance and herd mentality of the common man. Unfortunately, it seems that the GOP is trying to appeal to and capitalize upon the public's base instincts and herd mentality.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
|
08-05-2010, 09:06 AM
|
|
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
|
|
Herd? Change?
Ah, that means legislating changing the definition of Marriage from the bench. "We WILL enlighten you, you ignorant masses!' At the wrong end of a gun.
Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
|
08-05-2010, 09:09 AM
|
|
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
Yup, when the majority tends to interfere with the rights of the minority, that's when the court steps in. There is no rational basis for the STATE to interfere with the decisions of two adults to commit to one another solely on the basis of the gender of the adults. A church has the First Amendment right to determine whose union it will sanction, but the church's preference should not determine the civil law.
Regards,
D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|
08-05-2010, 09:17 AM
|
|
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
|
|
All hail the the all wise State! Please, save us from ourselves.
Strange that it was never an issue before. I guess all those great lib leaders all those years were evil too.
Guess we'll have to change the Constitution. Unless the court can find the Constitution unConstitutional!
Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
|
08-05-2010, 09:23 AM
|
|
Area Man
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete
Thank Goodness the will of the people has been overturned.
Pete
|
As it sometimes must be.
Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
|
08-05-2010, 09:37 AM
|
|
Area Man
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete
All hail the the all wise State! Please, save us from ourselves.
Strange that it was never an issue before. I guess all those great lib leaders all those years were evil too.
Guess we'll have to change the Constitution. Unless the court can find the Constitution unConstitutional!
Pete
|
The Constitution defines marriage? I don't recall reading that. But, I do recall these words, "..certain inaliable rights, principle among these the right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness." How can people be free if the masses are forcing their religious beliefs on others? Which is what this boils down to; An attempt by the right to legislate their religious beliefs, something I personally regard as a step towards theocracy. A state endorsement of a specific religious dogma, also a clear constitutional violation.
Sorry, but I do and always will believe that there are times when the state MUST step in and protect a minority from the will of the masses in order to protect individual liberties. Without it there is no individual liberty.
Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
|
08-05-2010, 09:43 AM
|
|
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
|
|
There are plenty of non religious types on both sides of this fence. What if my happiness includes polygamy?
Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.
|