Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-25-2013, 12:06 AM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,237
It'll be the bondholders.
They have more and better judges and lawyers (no offense) in their hip pockets. Pretty shitty deal considering that the older of those retirees don't even have Social Security to fall back on. The only thing they ever had was their pensions and this is it, they will be lucky to get less than bupkis.

Let them eat cake, I guess... how did that work out the last time?
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-25-2013, 07:46 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
It'll be the bondholders.
They have more and better judges and lawyers (no offense) in their hip pockets. Pretty shitty deal considering that the older of those retirees don't even have Social Security to fall back on. The only thing they ever had was their pensions and this is it, they will be lucky to get less than bupkis.

Let them eat cake, I guess... how did that work out the last time?
Maybe not. Michigan has specific language in its constitution which may (or may not) supersede a bankruptcy process.

“The accrued financial benefits of each pension plan and retirement system of the state and its political subdivisions shall be a contractual obligation thereof and shall not be diminished or impaired thereby,” reads Section 24 of Article IX.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-25-2013, 02:14 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Maybe not. Michigan has specific language in its constitution which may (or may not) supersede a bankruptcy process.

“The accrued financial benefits of each pension plan and retirement system of the state and its political subdivisions shall be a contractual obligation thereof and shall not be diminished or impaired thereby,” reads Section 24 of Article IX.
Would you be so kind as to clue in your governor? From all accounts I've read he doesn't appear to believe a contract is a contract.
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-26-2013, 06:07 PM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 14,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
Would you be so kind as to clue in your governor? From all accounts I've read he doesn't appear to believe a contract is a contract.
Not a question of what the gov. knows or thinks. Bankruptcy is Federal and employee pension protection is in the state constitution. So question then is will the Federal bankruptcy protection if granted voidsthe state constitutional guarantees. I am sure though that a lot of law suits will be filed and the attorneys will collect first.

Here is an informative article in Forbes:

www.forbes.com/sites/jeffreydorfman/2013/07/25/detroits-bankruptcy-should-be-a-warning-to-every-worker-expecting-a-pension-or-social-security/2/
__________________
White Christian Nationalism:
Freedom for us, order for everyone else, and violence for those who transgress.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-26-2013, 05:30 PM
icenine's Avatar
icenine icenine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
It'll be the bondholders.
They have more and better judges and lawyers (no offense) in their hip pockets. Pretty shitty deal considering that the older of those retirees don't even have Social Security to fall back on. The only thing they ever had was their pensions and this is it, they will be lucky to get less than bupkis.

Let them eat cake, I guess... how did that work out the last time?
Yep bad deal...but are you saying the city workers did not have SSI taken out of their pay? So they could get it when they retired?
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.