Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
Your persistent efforts, through convoluted logic and obfuscation, to discredit intelligence reports of Russian/Putin involvement in our election do indeed defend Russia/Putin. That much is clear. What isn't clear is your motive. Sound familiar?
Why don't you spell out your motive for all of us to see?
|
Damn, you can't even get the minor details right. It's no wonder you miss the big picture.
I've not "discredited" or denied that hacking occurred. I still don't think we can prove who did it, and if we can't do that it's pretty difficult to discern motive. Yet the media is talking leaks from "officials" and unnamed sources in the CIA which and running with them as fact. That includes your latest link from NBC suggesting Putin did it.
Certainty appears as if the hacks came from Russia, and there's apparent circumstantial evidence connecting it to Russian intelligence. From there, it's probably not hard to then say the Russian gov't was involved. Anything beyond that is sheer speculation.
But apparently you, and probably many others, treat the suggestion that this was all about a Putin effort to favor Trump as gospel because when someone points out the apparent lack of evidence and reporting based on unofficial leaks, you accuse them of treason.
12-15-2016, 12:03 PM
Threaded Mode