Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-28-2010, 08:18 PM
stereocuuple's Avatar
stereocuuple stereocuuple is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: chicago Il. rogers park
Posts: 417
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Honestly, I don't buy the spinoff argument. Plus, I find it ironic for one to criticize government waste, incompetence, etc., but then argue in favor of outrageously expensive government programs based upon the possibility of "pennies on a dollar " returns on spinoff technologies.

P.S. I don't like Tang and I think our republic would do just fine without it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
But Dave, all those calendars, lunch boxes and coffee mugs that'll never get made now.

What a wasted opportunity! (For the Chinese)

John
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
Ah, but Velcro!

John
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
The conventional wisdom is that Velcro was a DoD spinoff technology. It was actually invented by a Swiss fellow on his own in 1941.

FWIW, I personally think the whole spinoff argument was likely developed by the "military-industrial complex" in an effort to garner support for expensive endeavors for which conventional benefit/cost analyses didn't fully pan out for them.
i never get tired of the self loving and self important leftwing commies. why dont you guys just sell the U.S.A to our enemies and that way you can make friends with your foriegn buddies who will surely save us all
__________________
puting the red back in red state
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-28-2010, 08:24 PM
stereocuuple's Avatar
stereocuuple stereocuuple is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: chicago Il. rogers park
Posts: 417
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Eddie View Post
Math isn't my thing, but I'll give this a shot.

Federal budget 2009: $3,550,000,000,000
Nasa budget 2008: $17,300,000,000

Okay, if I recall correctly, to find a percentage you divide the little number by the big number.

17,300,000,000/3,550,000,000,000=0.00487323944%

Maybe I'm doing it wrong. Maybe my numbers are off. But I can't find any info that says anything else. NASA is less than 1% of the federal budget. I don't give a crap if they don't create jobs, or lead to new cookware. It's worth it just to discover. 1 flippin' percent. Too much to ask to feed human curiosity.

That's just sad. We could cut that much out of the military budget and not even notice it. Hell, even the trivial savings in Medicade that we would have seen from the health care deal would be more than that. Of course, we won't see that at all now. So we're left to cut NASA because that is the 1% that will put us in the black. Please. You have to be kidding me.
i agree however this isint about $$$ its about putting the nation in the backseat. my parents genaration would never have done this. america is the greatest nation in the history of the earth. we did not get here by placing 2nd and we wont stay here that way either. maby obama should give advice to olympic athleats to just slow down and let the other guys win
__________________
puting the red back in red state
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-28-2010, 08:54 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by stereocuuple View Post
i never get tired of the self loving and self important leftwing commies. why dont you guys just sell the U.S.A to our enemies and that way you can make friends with your foriegn buddies who will surely save us all
My new avatar works!

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-28-2010, 09:51 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Eddie View Post
Math isn't my thing, but I'll give this a shot.

Federal budget 2009: $3,550,000,000,000
Nasa budget 2008: $17,300,000,000

Okay, if I recall correctly, to find a percentage you divide the little number by the big number.

17,300,000,000/3,550,000,000,000=0.00487323944%

Maybe I'm doing it wrong. Maybe my numbers are off. But I can't find any info that says anything else. NASA is less than 1% of the federal budget. I don't give a crap if they don't create jobs, or lead to new cookware. It's worth it just to discover. 1 flippin' percent. Too much to ask to feed human curiosity.
While your math is fine, if every programs' advocates made the same argument, no cuts in the budget could ever be made. Just like the saying
“Don’t tax you, don’t tax me, tax that man behind the tree,” a similar statement could be made about budget cuts.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-28-2010, 09:57 PM
westgate westgate is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ʇuoɯɹǝʌ ɟo ɔılqndǝɹ sǝldoǝd
Posts: 277

"hmmm, one of my flock has paid attention.
mega dittoes from me and mr. snerdley to you, sir."

Last edited by westgate; 01-28-2010 at 11:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-28-2010, 09:59 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by stereocuuple View Post
i agree however this isint about $$$ its about putting the nation in the backseat. my parents genaration would never have done this. america is the greatest nation in the history of the earth. we did not get here by placing 2nd and we wont stay here that way either. maby obama should give advice to olympic athleats to just slow down and let the other guys win
Your parents' generation didn't have a total national debt of:


As for being the greatest nation on earth and not wanting to place 2nd, geopolitics and establishing national priorities aren't just silly games designed to stroke your ego. Without question, we are the greatest nation on earth in one key area - size of national debt.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 01-28-2010 at 10:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:06 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
http://www.usdebtclock.org/

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:14 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandy G View Post
From what I've seen, read & heard, the dream of "Star Trek" interplanetary travel will remain just that-a dream. We CAN'T go fast enuff to decently make a stab at the tremendous distances involved. Mars is what, an 18 month round trip ? And that's about the same sort of thing as toodlin' over to yr next door neighbors' house, relatively speaking. The next stars are several light-years away...And that's assuming we could travel at the speed of light-Which we can't. Aren't even gonna come close. Even if we COULD somehow build the awfulest hot-rod spaceship that would make Cap'n Kirk green w/envy, there's the small matter of physial laws that state that as a body approaches the speed of light, it gets INFINITELY heavier & shorter... Even the Gambinos can't break THOSE laws. We may, some day, get to communicate w/another species from another planet, but that will prolly be about the best we can do. Personally, I wish it WASN'T like that....
From what my son tells me, I am nowhere near up on this, we have a better chance of entering another dimension than another galaxy.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:21 PM
westgate westgate is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ʇuoɯɹǝʌ ɟo ɔılqndǝɹ sǝldoǝd
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandy G View Post
From what I've seen, read & heard, the dream of "Star Trek" interplanetary travel will remain just that-a dream.
.
.
.
Personally, I wish it WASN'T like that....
my sentiments too. after growing up on a tv 'diet' of star trek, star wars, etc, it's always been my dream that we'd get to see some serious space travel in my lifetime.
but without a 'warp' or whatever you wanna call it, drive, we ain't going nowhere, maybe mars eventually, but that's about it.

and that greatly saddens me.

Last edited by westgate; 01-29-2010 at 11:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:33 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Writewing View Post
I think we have far too many things to do on this planet, lets fix this one before we ruxh to leave it. There is plenty of things to work on based on what we have already discovered.
Agreed. +1.

And this coming from an amateur astronomer.

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.