In defense of military tribunals.

[Zeke]

Originally Posted by BlueStreak

I see your point. But, it does help that the President at least knows what an aircraft carrier is and the shipbuilder knows what an aircraft carrier does. That's my point.

Dave

100% valid and taken.

[BlueStreak]

Zeke, go to post #132 in the "Mississippi" thread. I have a question for you there.

Dave

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by BlueStreak

(Oh, and please re-read my previous post #56. I think you might have missed something. Or nearly everything, perhaps?)




Sorry, I didn't know about your child. That's a tough situation, my hats off to you. You did what you had to do. Sounds like you are a good manager and a good father.

However;
I don't know how you can possibly get the notion that I have drawn "conclusions based on generalities" out of post #56?

But, it's no matter. I won't waste any more of my time arguing with someone who refuses to admit to being dead wrong. Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Dave

let me jump in here as the referee. Post 56 draws no conculsions.

Proceed.

[piece-itpete]

Originally Posted by noonereal

I think it's just a bad joke. Let's appreciate the attempt at levity as laughter is way more important than politics.

Pete, what do you have to make us laugh? Pete's way good at being funny.

Sorry, had to watch the Browns fail miserably and then put up with the neighborhood block party...

At least I had some Samuel Smith's Organic Ale to help!

Originally Posted by d-ray657

I see that you are a master in your own mind.

Regards,

D-Ray

It took a while D, but that's funny

Pete

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by piece-itpete

It took a while D, but that's funny

Pete

Thanks Pete. Coming from you that means something. Now, if you just had as good taste in politics as humor, we'd have you running on all cylinders.

Regards,

D-Ray