Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-30-2011, 03:15 PM
djv8ga djv8ga is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Open Border
Posts: 5,126
Obama is kicking ass in this fight. It took Bush how many years to get Saddam?
I hate the guy, but he and Pinetta (who I think is a huge improvement) both deserve a giant pat on the back.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-30-2011, 03:31 PM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
With extra hair?

Pete
Where???

Q: What do you call an Arab with a goat under one arm and a sheep under the other?

A: Bisexual.

For those who have never heard it before, if they still exist.

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-30-2011, 03:35 PM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by djv8ga View Post
Obama is kicking ass in this fight. It took Bush how many years to get Saddam?
I hate the guy, but he and Pinetta (who I think is a huge improvement) both deserve a giant pat on the back.
You're setting us up, right???

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-30-2011, 03:38 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by djv8ga View Post
Obama is kicking ass in this fight. It took Bush how many years to get Saddam?
I hate the guy, but he and Pinetta (who I think is a huge improvement) both deserve a giant pat on the back.
After an objective comment like that, I hate to pick on the Tea Party, but I think it is relevant - If Obama had the same kind of balls when dealing with the tea party as he has had in dealing with Al Queda, he would be way higher in the polls. But then again, most of the people who oppose the way he has dealt with the Al Queda leaders don't have a vote.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-30-2011, 03:39 PM
djv8ga djv8ga is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Open Border
Posts: 5,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles View Post
You're setting us up, right???

Chas
No, really. The progress (Kills for you Lefty's) has been impressive. You don't agree?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-30-2011, 03:42 PM
bhunter's Avatar
bhunter bhunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 3,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
The head of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and mastermind of the attacks at Ft. Hood and the attempted Times Square bombing was waxed by a drone this morning in Yemen.

How long will it take before the GOP rushes in to claim partial credit for this one too?
I'm not sure I like the precedent that we're setting with our unmanned assassination planes. This technology will surely be duplicated and used by others. The situation becomes significantly worse if leaders of sovereign states are targeted. Even some municipal police forces are acquiring remote surveillance planes.
__________________
Dear Optimist: Unless life gives you water and sugar too, your lemonade will suck.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-30-2011, 03:54 PM
djv8ga djv8ga is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Open Border
Posts: 5,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhunter View Post
I'm not sure I like the precedent that we're setting with our unmanned assassination planes. This technology will surely be duplicated and used by others. The situation becomes significantly worse if leaders of sovereign states are targeted. Even some municipal police forces are acquiring remote surveillance planes.
It's better than more dead American kids. Why do we on the right want a strong military, better weapons, and all the other BS if we continue not to use it and send kids to their death over crap that isn't even a national security issue?
The Left has a point when it comes to defense spending. The military industrial complex must be squashed unless we are willing to use these fabulous tools of war.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-30-2011, 04:37 PM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by djv8ga View Post
No, really. The progress (Kills for you Lefty's) has been impressive. You don't agree?
Since it's happening on their watch, they get the credit.

But it kinds of reminds me of the stuffed tux crowd driving the golden spike at the festivities on the completion of the transcontinental railroad.

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-30-2011, 04:44 PM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
After an objective comment like that, I hate to pick on the Tea Party, but I think it is relevant - If Obama had the same kind of balls when dealing with the tea party as he has had in dealing with Al Queda, he would be way higher in the polls. But then again, most of the people who oppose the way he has dealt with the Al Queda leaders don't have a vote.

Regards,

D-Ray
I'm sure he could cut a deal with most mainstream republicans to send in the drones on the TEA party.

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-30-2011, 04:55 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by djv8ga View Post
No, really. The progress (Kills for you Lefty's) has been impressive. You don't agree?
I'm sure it was just a typo, but Chas a lefty? Really? Call me a leftist or a socialist and it will be pretty close to the truth (there goes my chance to ever run for office), but the Bug Tussel philosopher as a lefty is a picture that my mind just can't seem to draw.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.