Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politicalchat.org discussion boards > Politics and the Environment
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-04-2016, 07:44 AM
catswiththum's Avatar
catswiththum catswiththum is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Edge of America
Posts: 1,509
To anyone interested, I recommend the documentary "Pandora's Promise," - clears away a lot of the hyperbole and provides a well done overview of nuclear energy options with some of the leading nuclear and environmental scientists/engineers.
__________________
Try to rely on yourself as much as possible - when things go to hell, you will know who to blame.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-04-2016, 10:48 AM
Pio1980's Avatar
Pio1980 Pio1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,070
The non disposable byproducts have always been a major problem with "the power too cheap to meter".
No doubt Hyman Rickover expected a level of competence as high as his own from the civilian side, unintended consequences notwithstanding.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Last edited by Pio1980; 05-04-2016 at 10:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-04-2016, 01:31 PM
catswiththum's Avatar
catswiththum catswiththum is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Edge of America
Posts: 1,509
The French seem to have a good handle on it - nuclear energy provides 75% of their electric power; they export around 3 billion Euros worth a year. They have constant gov. and scientific collaboration actively accelerating the recycling/reusability/waste storage processes.
__________________
Try to rely on yourself as much as possible - when things go to hell, you will know who to blame.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-04-2016, 01:36 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by catswiththum View Post
The French seem to have a good handle on it - nuclear energy provides 75% of their electric power; they export around 3 billion Euros worth a year. They have constant gov. and scientific collaboration actively accelerating the recycling/reusability/waste storage processes.
From the OP.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/08/bu...rgy-areva.html
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2016, 01:45 PM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by catswiththum View Post
The French seem to have a good handle on it - nuclear energy provides 75% of their electric power; they export around 3 billion Euros worth a year. They have constant gov. and scientific collaboration actively accelerating the recycling/reusability/waste storage processes.
Nuclear is in the group...If it can go wrong , it will. However its wrong is mega.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04-2016, 01:52 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion View Post
Nuclear is in the group...If it can go wrong , it will. However its wrong is mega.
Perhaps so, but far more have been killed over the years due to the use of coal from mining accidents and respiratory disease. The environmental impact of coal hasn't been exactly benign either from mountain-top removal to rivers polluted from mine drainage to acid rain killing lakes hundreds of miles from power plants to dirty air. Unfortunately, there is no free lunch.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04-2016, 02:01 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Perhaps so, but far more have been killed over the years due to the use of coal from mining accidents and respiratory disease. The environmental impact of coal hasn't been exactly benign either from mountain-top removal to rivers polluted from mine drainage to acid rain killing lakes hundreds of miles from power plants to dirty air. Unfortunately, there is no free lunch.
Another one that needs to go. You're on a roll, Pat.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2016, 02:15 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
Another one that needs to go. You're on a roll, Pat.
It's absolutely true. I'm not an absolute fan (nor foe) of nuclear power, but believe that at this point in time, it's still a viable component of the nation's power-generation capacity, as is coal, gas, wind, solar, hydropower and conservation. Other than conservation, all have a downside. Nuclear is low risk/high consequence whereas some other the others are high risk/low consequence. Pick your poison, as it were.

Your argument reminds me of criticism of the Green Party in Germany back about 35 years back. Roughly translated, it was that the Greens believed that their electricity came directly from the power receptacle (i.e., it was spontaneously generated in a pure fashion magically at the plug).
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 05-04-2016 at 02:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-04-2016, 03:17 PM
Pio1980's Avatar
Pio1980 Pio1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
It's absolutely true. I'm not an absolute fan (nor foe) of nuclear power, but believe that at this point in time, it's still a viable component of the nation's power-generation capacity, as is coal, gas, wind, solar, hydropower and conservation. Other than conservation, all have a downside. Nuclear is low risk/high consequence whereas some other the others are high risk/low consequence. Pick your poison, as it were.

Your argument reminds me of criticism of the Green Party in Germany back about 35 years back. Roughly translated, it was that the Greens believed that their electricity came directly from the power receptacle (i.e., it was spontaneously generated in a pure fashion magically at the plug).
It doesn't??

Something some of the electric car proponents seem to believe.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-04-2016, 04:26 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980 View Post
It doesn't??

Something some of the electric car proponents seem to believe.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
Electric cars powered by electricity from non-polluting, renewable sources. Electric cars by themselves aren't the solution but they're a part of it.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.