Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-03-2017, 07:22 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
I know...let's blame Hillary and the DNC for 2016.

Nope. Elect a black president for two terms and kiss the poor white disenfranchised working class bigots good-by. But Ike...it's so unfair to accuse white people of being racists anymore, besides, it's so much more fun blame the outcome of the last election on Hillary and the Democratic Party. Yeah...well...my ass.

Quote:
Indeed, whites without a college degree have sharply shifted Republican over the last two presidential election cycles.
NPR - Trump hits new low with non-college whites.

And...

Quote:
When President Obama took office, white Americans with a high school diploma or less education identified about equally as Democratic or Democratic-leaning and Republican and Republican-leaning. But since then, the share of people that identify as Republican or leaning Republican has jumped by 14 percentage points since 2008, from 45 to 59 percent.
NPR - White non-college voters have fled the Democratic Party

Here are the graphs...



Well guess what...even white people with college educations fled to the Republican Party while Obama was in office. Fucking white people.

Last edited by Ike Bana; 08-03-2017 at 07:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-03-2017, 09:15 AM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
Looks like a blame shift.

Hillary lost the election, own it.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-03-2017, 09:34 AM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 14,206
Hillary was damaged goods and it showed, and there was 'Clinton' fatigue just like the GOP with 'Bush' fatigue. But the enormously corrupt and stupid DNC had to have Hillary follow Obama (first black president) as the first female president. Difference is that Obama was credible and could mount a real campaign whereas H--> was pretending to campaign. The DNC owns the H--> nomination and the 2016 loss. But let's blame it on Bernie, after all he is a commie.
__________________
White Christian Nationalism:
Freedom for us, order for everyone else, and violence for those who transgress.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-03-2017, 09:57 AM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajoo View Post
Hillary was damaged goods and it showed, and there was 'Clinton' fatigue just like the GOP with 'Bush' fatigue. But the enormously corrupt and stupid DNC had to have Hillary follow Obama (first black president) as the first female president. Difference is that Obama was credible and could mount a real campaign whereas H--> was pretending to campaign. The DNC owns the H--> nomination and the 2016 loss. But let's blame it on Bernie, after all he is a commie.
Bernie? You mean the guy who lost by four million votes in the primaries?
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-03-2017, 10:29 AM
MrPots MrPots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,554
Trump? The guy who lost by 3 million votes in the actual elections?

Just sayin'
__________________
It occurs to me that republicans seem to view black, Mexican, LGBT, Muslims and poor people in the same light as Nazi Germans once viewed Jewish people. We must be vigilant that it goes no further.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-03-2017, 10:48 AM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPots View Post
Trump? The guy who lost by 3 million votes in the actual elections?

Just sayin'
Good point, Potter. Thanks.
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-03-2017, 11:55 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer View Post
Looks like a blame shift.

Hillary lost the election, own it.
It appears that Bob is right about you.

Apparently the notion that half, if not more, of white people in this country are bigots and the lower their education level, the higher their bigot factor...may not be particularly popular in these parts.

Last edited by Ike Bana; 08-03-2017 at 01:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-03-2017, 02:06 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
Nope. Elect a black president for two terms and kiss the poor white disenfranchised working class bigots good-by. But Ike...it's so unfair to accuse white people of being racists anymore, besides, it's so much more fun blame the outcome of the last election on Hillary and the Democratic Party. Yeah...well...my ass.

Well guess what...even white people with college educations fled to the Republican Party while Obama was in office. Fucking white people.
Wow, you are really a hate filled little race-baiter. The Dems conceded the white working class vote a while ago. Here it is, in the words of a lefty luminary, all the way back in 2011:

For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly severe losses among white voters. But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class.

All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment — professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists — and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic.


...and this:

The 2012 approach treats white voters without college degrees as an unattainable cohort. The Democratic goal with these voters is to keep Republican winning margins to manageable levels, in the 12 to 15 percent range, as opposed to the 30-point margin of 2010 — a level at which even solid wins among minorities and other constituencies are not enough to produce Democratic victories.

So it wasn't "racism" and a reaction to a "black president". Its the result of a Democrat party political strategy informed by political realities that pre-date Obama. Take off your hate-filled green colored glasses and see reality. The party of the "working guy" decided to leave the "working guy" behind a while ago.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-03-2017, 03:24 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Wow, you are really a hate filled little race-baiter. The Dems conceded the white working class vote a while ago. Here it is, in the words of a lefty luminary, all the way back in 2011:

For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly severe losses among white voters. But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class.

All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment — professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists — and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic.


...and this:

The 2012 approach treats white voters without college degrees as an unattainable cohort. The Democratic goal with these voters is to keep Republican winning margins to manageable levels, in the 12 to 15 percent range, as opposed to the 30-point margin of 2010 — a level at which even solid wins among minorities and other constituencies are not enough to produce Democratic victories.

So it wasn't "racism" and a reaction to a "black president". Its the result of a Democrat party political strategy informed by political realities that pre-date Obama. Take off your hate-filled green colored glasses and see reality. The party of the "working guy" decided to leave the "working guy" behind a while ago.
Taking debate lessons from Steven Miller these days?
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-03-2017, 05:52 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
Taking debate lessons from Steven Miller these days?
It must suck to be a Trumpster these days.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.