Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politicalchat.org discussion boards > Conspiracy theory corner
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 01-10-2022, 05:30 PM
BigElCat's Avatar
BigElCat BigElCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: South of KC, Kansas
Posts: 1,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
The following is drawn from the U.S. Justice Department's page on Entrapment. This defense would have to be developed from detailed evidence at trial; it cannot be assumed from a newspaper-level outline of a sting case.

There are two elements to an entrapment defense:
1) The government induces the crime
2) The defendent lacked predisposition to commit the crime

Lack of either element is fatal to an entrapment defense.

To show inducement, the defense must show more that government artifice or deceit. They must show:
* at least persuasion or mild coercion
* OR, pleas based on need, sympathy, or friendship
* OR, extraordinary promises
Inducement shown only if government's behavior was such that "a law-abiding citizen's will to obey the law could have been overborne."

"The predisposition inquiry focuses upon whether the defendant "was an unwary innocent or, instead, an unwary criminal who readily availed himself of the opportunity to perpetrate the crime."

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/...pment-elements
Very informative. Most likely the Whitmer conspirators will be found guilty.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.