Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-03-2017, 09:58 PM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
This isn't "practical" either. Just ask the folks in Cali, whose legislature punted on a similar proposal because of the anticipated costs, and no way to pay for it.
It works fine all over Europe. Americans just need to decide that they need to pay for a decent health care system more than they need to pay foe ridiculous shit like 11 active aircraft carrier battle groups.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-03-2017, 10:20 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
It works fine all over Europe. Americans just need to decide that they need to pay for a decent health care system more than they need to pay foe ridiculous shit like 11 active aircraft carrier battle groups.
I'm sure the European political elite often quietly that their lucky stars that they don't need to make large military expenditures so they can use some of the savings to deliver adequately controlled and rationed health care.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-03-2017, 11:37 PM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
I'm sure the European political elite often quietly that their lucky stars...
EIB/FOX gasbag jibberish. And, not surprisingly, this comment doesn't make any fucking sense.

Last edited by Ike Bana; 09-04-2017 at 08:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-04-2017, 04:37 AM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
I'm sure the European political elite often quietly that their lucky stars that they don't need to make large military expenditures so they can use some of the savings to deliver adequately controlled and rationed health care.
We really don't need to be making such colossal military expenditures either. But, so many of our fellow Americans are such frightened, xenophobic pussies they have to have a military three times what's necessary and a loaded gun in every room, every vehicle and on their person at all times.

Land of the brave my ass.
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-04-2017, 07:44 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
We really don't need to be making such colossal military expenditures either. But, so many of our fellow Americans are such frightened, xenophobic pussies they have to have a military three times what's necessary and a loaded gun in every room, every vehicle and on their person at all times.

Land of the brave my ass.
Active US aircraft carrier strike groups...11. Commissioned and battle ready US aircraft carriers...20.

Country with the next largest fleet of active carrier strike groups is India...2. Countries with the next largest number of commissioned and battle ready aircraft carriers...France and Japan with 4. Those countries have one active aircraft carrier group each.

I feel so much more safe and secure knowing that we have a carrier strike group at the ready, protecting each of our 11 coastlines.

And Americans believe we are militarily vulnerable because of Barack Obama...and we can't afford universal Medicare. The country is fucked in the head.

Last edited by Ike Bana; 09-04-2017 at 08:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-04-2017, 10:01 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
Active US aircraft carrier strike groups...11. Commissioned and battle ready US aircraft carriers...20.

Country with the next largest fleet of active carrier strike groups is India...2. Countries with the next largest number of commissioned and battle ready aircraft carriers...France and Japan with 4. Those countries have one active aircraft carrier group each.
Russia only has one carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, and it is an absolute piece of shit.

The vessel is powered by steam turbines and turbo-pressurized boilers that are so unreliable that it is accompanied by a large ocean-going tug whenever it deploys, in case it breaks down.

Flaws in the water piping system mean it freezes during winter. To prevent pipes bursting, the water is turned off to most of the cabins and half the latrines do no work.

Mr Roberts, a former Royal Navy officer, said: “There’s nothing more depressing for a naval captain when he leaves home waters than to be escorted by a tug because even your commander in chief thinks you are going to break down.”

One sailor was killed when a fire started on board the ship during a visit to Turkey in 2009. The ship also spilled hundreds of tons of oil in the Irish Sea during a refuelling accident the same year.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...ical-problems/
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-04-2017, 12:29 PM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
But we need 11 active carrier strike groups to deal with our biggest worry...the fucking Russians. The estimated cost to run a Nimitz class carrier strike group is a bit over $2.5 million/day...a bit under $1 billion/year. That's $11 billion/year for our carrier force, plus whatever the expenses are to keep the other 9 commissioned aircraft carriers battle ready 365 days a year. But that's peanuts as a strike group built around a new Gerald R. Ford class carrier has been estimated to cost as much as $7 million/day...$2.5 billion/year. And the Pentagon, of course would like to have all the old Nimitz class flat tops, replaced with Ford class.

Just in case.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-04-2017, 05:54 PM
mpholland's Avatar
mpholland mpholland is offline
reflexionar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 2,273
I am pretty sure we could drastically reduce our military, but other countries would need to increase theirs if that happened. I am pretty sure we are considered the world police and also pretty sure that other countries are happy to let us spend our money to maintain that status. They might call us paranoid warmongerers, but they don't seem to have issues with being allied to us, knowing that we will be there to spend our money to keep them from being a target. This allows them to spend much less on their military and afford such things as universal healthcare. I would be quite content if we did a massive downsize and worried about our own country and let the rest of the world fend for itself. Ain't gonna happen, but its a nice thought.
__________________
“Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.” Douglas Adams
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-04-2017, 08:46 PM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Russia only has one carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, and it is an absolute piece of shit.

The vessel is powered by steam turbines and turbo-pressurized boilers that are so unreliable that it is accompanied by a large ocean-going tug whenever it deploys, in case it breaks down.

Flaws in the water piping system mean it freezes during winter. To prevent pipes bursting, the water is turned off to most of the cabins and half the latrines do no work.

Mr Roberts, a former Royal Navy officer, said: “There’s nothing more depressing for a naval captain when he leaves home waters than to be escorted by a tug because even your commander in chief thinks you are going to break down.”


One sailor was killed when a fire started on board the ship during a visit to Turkey in 2009. The ship also spilled hundreds of tons of oil in the Irish Sea during a refuelling accident the same year.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...ical-problems/
It is not about Russia.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-05-2017, 11:19 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion View Post
It is not about Russia.
What is not about Russia?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.