|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
05-02-2015, 08:25 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerets
For there is little protection on intellectual rights or patients I've seen so far.
Barney
|
I wonder if that's another nod to China. In China, there is no equivalent concept of "what I create or possess is mine". If you've ever traveled to China, particularly on business, you may have had the unsettling experience of having your hotel room visited, your personal effects examined, and if you leave any electronics in the room, they will be opened, turned on, examined, and likely scanned or copied.
|
05-02-2015, 09:57 AM
|
|
Reformed Know-Nothing
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,919
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
I wonder if that's another nod to China...
|
China is not a part of the deal, though they may be part of the cause. The participating countries are the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
|
05-02-2015, 10:07 AM
|
|
Jigsawed
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,580
|
|
So we are going to make workers more vulnerable to protect banksters from
the new kid on the block...China.
|
05-02-2015, 12:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
China is not a part of the deal, though they may be part of the cause. The participating countries are the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam.
|
I guess that was my point. In the next 50 years, the one commodity that I suspect will be taking it on the chin is intellectual property rights, and property rights in general. Sadly, with the rise of China, I suspect is will be easier to move their way on that issue rather than China moving toward protections for property and intellectual property rights.
|
05-02-2015, 01:30 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
I guess that was my point. In the next 50 years, the one commodity that I suspect will be taking it on the chin is intellectual property rights, and property rights in general.
|
Well, there's popular sovereignty.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|
05-02-2015, 01:58 PM
|
|
Jigsawed
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,580
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
Well, there's popular sovereignty.
|
Oh shit!
Fast track was invented to give that short shrift.
|
05-03-2015, 08:50 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
Well, there's popular sovereignty.
|
On the decline here, and non-existent in China.
|
05-03-2015, 09:08 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
On the decline here, and non-existent in China.
|
That would be...... ummm...... my point.
Hell, it's even an assault on national sovereignty.
TPP accelerates the rate of that loss, by a transfer of sovereignty to transnational corporations, at a time when we should be striving for the restoration of popular sovereignty.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|
05-02-2015, 10:43 PM
|
|
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
China is not a part of the deal, though they may be part of the cause. The participating countries are the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam.
|
That Taiwan is not among the participants might just be a clear indication as to who/what this alliance is meant to address.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Last edited by nailer; 05-02-2015 at 10:47 PM.
|
05-03-2015, 07:21 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,214
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer
That Taiwan is not among the participants might just be a clear indication as to who/what this alliance is meant to address.
|
China tho not a signatory is a major producer and soon to be the number one market. So by being the destination of outsourced jobs and pirated technologies with little redress, any deal made seems to me pointless.
Is it the simple fact China would refuse to comply even if a agreement was reached with them? Or industry in the other countries trying to squeeze the last bit of profit before China's rise to the top?
Barney
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.
|