Pope John Paul's Beatification ....

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Sorry, Pete. We'll be running a Christian born in Hawaii. We'll be thrilled with any of the ones that the GOP has offered up so far. Any of them will suffice as a doormat. Although, I'd pick Trump if I had my druthers.

Regards,

D-Ray

If they put up any one of those clowns who "debated" last night in South Carolina, Michelle can go to the engravers this week and get invitations made for the Inaugural Ball.

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by finnbow

If they put up any one of those clowns who "debated" last night in South Carolina, Michelle can go to the engravers this week and get invitations made for the Inaugural Ball.

Here's Dana Milbank's take.

Regards,

D-Ray

[whell]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Here's Dana Milbank's take.

Regards,

D-Ray

Millbank is no less an adolescent than those that he wrote about in that article.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

Millbank is no less an adolescent than those that he wrote about in that article.

Perhaps so. But he's not running.

"If there’s any good news for the Republican Party to come out of the first presidential debate, it’s that the Associated Press and Reuters didn’t cover it."

QFT

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by whell

Millbank is no less an adolescent than those that he wrote about in that article.

What's your take on the GOP candidates. Respond here, rather than take this thread further from the OP.

Regards,

D-Ray

[piece-itpete]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Sorry, Pete. We'll be running a Christian born in Hawaii. .....

SUUUUUUUURE you will

Pete

[piece-itpete]

Ach nay! A we going to argue about the plain fact that we were, again?

Pete

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by piece-itpete

Ach nay! A we going to argue about the plain fact that we were, again?

Pete

Nah. We settled it.

[flacaltenn]

Quote:
Originally Posted by flacaltenn
The secular humanists have absolutely no humility. That's disturbing. These are the ultimate know-it-alls.

It goes both ways. Religious people insist that non-religious lack morals or a deeper understanding of life. Do morals or a deeper understanding derive from belief in myths?

FinBow: Glad you asked. I support people of faith because I've pondered this exact question. See it's not the "belief in myths" part that makes faithful people credible in their commitment to morals -- It's the DISCIPLINE and RITUAL and regular EXERCISE of those scruples and tenets that give them MORE credibility than your eggheaded secular humanist. Getting you ass and your families' asses out of bed every Sunday to go RENEW those commitments. Or as I now look at the important relief work being done by the strong church communities here after the tornado disasters. I don't tractor trailers of Atheist relief or Secular Humanist donuts being offered.

There's a lot to be said about discipline and exercise of your morals, and I don't see those mechanisms for the know-it-alls over on the secular humanist side. Just a lot of chest-thumping superiority and dreadful lack of humility...

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by flacaltenn

There's a lot to be said about discipline and exercise of your morals, and I don't see those mechanisms for the know-it-alls over on the secular humanist side. Just a lot of chest-thumping superiority and dreadful lack of humility...

Pot:Kettle (as I search for the humility in the above statement).