Japanese debate limited preemptive strike capacity

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

Yawn. Meanwhile, South Korea appears to be opening the door to debate the return on US nukes.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.82b07b927cb7

You have no understanding what you've read or what you're talking about. The OP refers to Japan considering the purchase of conventional cruise missiles and you compare this with Trump's campaign rhetoric of allowing Japan and South Korea to come out from under the US nuclear umbrella and develop and control their own nuclear arsenal - two decidedly different things.

Then you compare Trump's statement with current consideration of redeploying US tactical nukes (under US command) in South Korea. This is again quite different than Korea developing and controlling its own nuclear arsenal. You're way out of your league when it comes to even understanding the difference between these three things. You should stick to stuff you're capable of understanding, as limited as that may be.

[Chicks]

It's a thread started by whell, a diehard Trumpie. It can be ignored, as can all threads started by whell. They're designed to provoke, not thought, of course, but baser reactions. Don't fall for it.

[BlueStreak]

Originally Posted by Chicks

It's a thread started by whell, a diehard Trumpie. It can be ignored, as can all threads started by whell. They're designed to provoke, not thought, of course, but baser reactions. Don't fall for it.

True. But, that's why I give him both. One for thoughtful reply, the other because it feels so right.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

It's a thread started by whell, a diehard Trumpie. It can be ignored, as can all threads started by whell. They're designed to provoke, not thought, of course, but baser reactions. Don't fall for it.

You usually lead the charge on the "baser reactions".