Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politicalchat.org discussion boards > Conspiracy theory corner
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-04-2011, 11:13 AM
flacaltenn's Avatar
flacaltenn flacaltenn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,145
Quote:
In general, I don't believe in conspiracy theories because of the number of people who would need to be involved, their complexity of doing things involving multiple government agencies and involve only people loyal to the conspiracy, and the inability for anybody in Washington to keep a secret.
In general, I agree Finbow. That's why I don't delve into each of these "conspiracies" further. I only use them as examples to build up a rational explanation of how 2 DEM/REP administrations (16 years) managed to mangle our foreign policy on Iraq so badly.

But, when the govt "shuts down" and investigation or redirects it intentionally, like in the case of Flight 800, there are fewer secrets to hide. And trust me on this (you too D-Ray), when an airplane crashes and the CIA gets called in to make a cartoon depiction of the data on the flight data recorder for release to the network news agencies, rather than the NTSB or the FCC, somethin's not right...

You can hide stuff pretty efficiently, even with thousands of folk involved. Why do you think that WikiLeaks was such a big deal?

Usually, conspiracies start BECAUSE the govt does something stupid or suspicious. Like losing the big metal door at the Branch Davidian compound that would have contained evidence of who fired first. Incompetence? Hard to tell. But when you have Texas Ranger witnesses saying the FBI carted off that door -- voila --- you have a conspiracy.

Or when the govt decides to do a limited release of the flight voice recorder for Flt 93, the 9/11 jet crashed in Penn -- but CLASSIFY the flight data recorder and NOT release that item which would reveal if perhaps WE shot it down, -- voila -- another conspiracy.

In almost ALL of the most convincing conspiracies I know, the govt has the ability to quash them IMMEDIATELY by releasing some key information, but for some dam reason, just decides to let them flail... Incompetence? or Hiding something? The conspirisists claim hiding, the non-believers must think it's just incompetence.. Advantage to ---- the conspirisists...

Hey -- just like Obama's long form certificate!!
Maybe a new age of clearing the air???
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.