The Heartland Institute

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

I see that the nomenclature has been updated. Its no longer called "global warming". Its called "climate change". Very convenient.

Dude, where you been, hiding under a cow patty? It's anthropogenic climate change.

[bobabode]

Anyone surprised that these sacks of excrement cut their teeth providing cover for Phillip Morris back in the '60s and '70s over tobacco?

[BlueStreak]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Anyone surprised that these sacks of excrement cut their teeth providing cover for Phillip Morris back in the '60s and '70s over tobacco?

Nope, no conscience at all. Profit above people any and every day of the week. They don't care if half the country drops dead smoking their poisonous shit and the other half goes bankrupt paying the medical costs. So long as the majority stockholders are smilin', they're smilin'.

Dave

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Anyone surprised that these sacks of excrement cut their teeth providing cover for Phillip Morris back in the '60s and '70s over tobacco?

It figures. With big numbers, it figures. It truly all adds up.

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by whell

I see that the nomenclature has been updated. Its no longer called "global warming". Its called "climate change". Very convenient.

Nope it went from ice age/global cooling to global warming and now climate change.

I absolutely agree we have climate change. The planet has had it since the big bang. I do prefer global warming because it created an environment for man to thrive. Much better than snowball earth which spanned a far greater time period than the warming cycle.

[BlueStreak]

Yes, the "worming cycle" is a serious issue. It's disgusting and slimy for one thing.

Dave

[Dondilion]

Specifically Methane: All camps agree 3% is the limit.

At least there is a conscientious minority who wants and tries to return
leaking methane to the system.

[4-2-7]

We need more trees everyone wants to point to cars and industry. If one would put two and two together we can see that deforestation and burning them falls into the same time period.

[BlueStreak]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

We need more trees everyone wants to point to cars and industry. If one would put two and two together we can see that deforestation and burning them falls into the same time period.

Tree hugger. People are burning down forests to make money. It's capitalism. So, not only are you now a tree hugger, but you're a Communist as well.

Why do you hate America, Dan?

Dave

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by BlueStreak

Tree hugger. People are burning down forests to make money. It's capitalism. So, not only are you now a tree hugger, but you're a Communist as well.

Why do you hate America, Dan?

Dave

Haw He's a big fan of Elephart garlic. http://www.audiokarma.org/forums/sho...d.php?t=594268